Momentum of projectile, i think

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem related to momentum and projectile motion, specifically involving a sled with a rider traveling off a cliff. The original poster expresses confusion about how to approach the problem, which involves calculating the distance the sled lands from the foot of the cliff.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of energy conservation principles to determine the sled's velocity at the top of the cliff and the subsequent kinematic analysis for projectile motion. Questions arise regarding the relevance of mass in the calculations, particularly when it cancels out in the energy conservation equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using energy conservation to simplify the problem, while others are exploring the implications of mass in the calculations. The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being considered.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has indicated a lack of familiarity with the problem format and has since provided a diagram to aid understanding. There is an emphasis on the absence of friction in the scenario, which influences the approach to the problem.

mdmode
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Question with data:

This is a question from an OWL program with my General Physics class. We are currently covering momentum, and this one throws me a curve.

A sled with rider having a combined mass of 125 kg travels over the perfectly smooth icy hill shown in the accompanying figure. (See Attachment)

How far (in m) does the sled land from the foot of the cliff?


Formulas:

Unknown...confused on how to approach problem.

Not exactly sure of how to go about this one, any suggestions?
 

Attachments

  • 1027475.jpg
    1027475.jpg
    3.7 KB · Views: 803
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please post in the proper format, because it makes it easier to answer questions. Also, a diagram would really help me understand this question if you can post one.
 
Sorry about the jumbled mess. I'm a noob here, and didn't keep the formatting in the original post. I'll know better next time. I have added the diagram from the problem now, and reworded the question, so maybe it is easier to understand now.
Thanks.
 
Well, since there is no friction - no dissipative forces, you can use energy conservation to get the velocity at the top of the cliff. After that, it's a simple kinematic problem involving some object flying off a cliff horizontally.
 
Thanks, matterwave, that makes it a lot simpler for me! I appreciate your help.
Peace and Grace to you!
 
I have used the law of energy conservation:
1/2mv_0^2=1/2mv^2+mgh, but then all mass crosses out. is this okay to solve the problem without using given mass?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
47
Views
20K