Monthly Physics Competition Questionnaire

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a monthly competition where participants answer a physics-related question for a chance to win a book, specifically "Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica." This month's question asks why objects held above the ground fall towards the Earth. Various responses explore the nature of gravity, with some participants humorously suggesting philosophical or nonsensical answers. The conversation includes playful banter about the nature of physics and mathematics, with participants debating the validity of their answers. Ultimately, the competition rules are emphasized, with some participants disregarding them and forfeiting their chances to win. The thread highlights a mix of serious inquiry and lighthearted interaction, culminating in a consensus that no one adhered to the rules, resulting in no prize being awarded.
  • #31
WannabeNewton said:
Needs more ##\nabla_a##

Dat ##\nabla##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
micromass said:
Dat ##\nabla##
It's the answer to everything according to 2001 Space Odyssey.
 
  • #33
WannabeNewton and micromass have both disregarded the rules of this competition by posting twice, after I allowed them to post only once, and have therefore forfeited the prize.
 
  • #34
AnTiFreeze3 said:
WannabeNewton and micromass have both disregarded the rules of this competition by posting twice, after I allowed them to post only once, and have therefore forfeited the prize.
Ain't nothin' but a thang.
 
  • #35
PhizKid said:
Prove that there is such thing as a gravitational force without using any Newtonian physics or descendants thereof (since Principia is the prize)

but I know physics only upto Newtonian level, so I explained on the basis of the knowledge which I have at the moment
 
  • #36
Viru.universe said:
but I know physics only upto Newtonian level, so I explained on the basis of the knowledge which I have at the moment

But you can't use Newtonian physics since that's the prize he's giving away!
 
  • #37
micromass said:
But you can't use Newtonian physics since that's the prize he's giving away!

well then I guess I'll try after a couple of years after learning some new stuff
 
  • #38
Everyone broke the rules, so no one gets the prize. I think I'll buy the book anyway and use it as a doorstop or something.
 
  • #39
AnTiFreeze3 said:
Everyone broke the rules, so no one gets the prize. I think I'll buy the book anyway and use it as a doorstop or something.
I happen to have a copy that I inherited from my uncle, zoobyinsole, when he passed away 85 years ago. Your doorstop idea is about the best use for it. A quick read through revealed the plot is beyond soporific, the characters are completely 2 dimensional, and the illustrations are like some sort of proto-cubism, all geometric and abstract. There's a lot of talk about the attraction of this body for that body, but none of the romances ever goes anywhere. It's no wonder it has never been made into a movie.

Incidentally, he says the bodies are attracted by the mysterious power of hypothesis non fingere. I think that's some sort of achemist's love potion, but I'm not sure.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K