More complex problem involving momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter PolyFX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Momentum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the momentum of a 0.55 kg block of ice after a perpendicular kick while it slides at 3.5 m/s. The initial momentum is calculated as 1.925 kg·m/s in the x-direction, and the magnitude of the momentum after the kick is determined to be 2.180 kg·m/s. The average force applied during the kick is found to be 409.4 N. The challenge lies in accurately determining the z-component of the momentum after the kick, which is crucial for deriving the unit vector in the direction of the block's momentum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear momentum and its components
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, particularly tangent and Pythagorean theorem
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law and net force concepts
  • Ability to perform vector calculations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to resolve vectors into components using trigonometric functions
  • Study the application of Newton's second law in momentum problems
  • Explore the concept of unit vectors and their significance in physics
  • Investigate common mistakes in momentum calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and momentum, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to vector analysis and force applications.

PolyFX
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 0.55 kg block of ice is sliding by you on a very slippery floor at 3.5 m/s. As it goes by, you give it a kick perpendicular to its path. Your foot is in contact with the ice block for 0.0025 seconds. The block eventually slides at an angle of 28 degrees from its original direction (labelled theta in the diagram). The overhead view shown in the diagram is approximately to scale. The arrow represents the average force your toe applies briefly to the block of ice.

What is the unit vector in the direction of the block's momentum after the kick?

What is the x-component of the block's momentum after the kick

What is the magnitude of the block's momentum after the kick?

find the z-component of the block's momentum after the kick

What was the magnitude of the average force you applied to the block?

Homework Equations


momentum = (mass)(velocity)
change in momentum = Fnet(time)

The Attempt at a Solution



I honestly have no clue what do do for this particular question. For example, what do I use the given angle (28 degrees) for?

This is how I tried the question:

First multiply the mass of the the block by the speed (0.55 x 3.5)
This will yield the momentum of the block

I don't know where to proceed beyond this point.

I need to find the momentum of the block after the kick. How do I do this? I only know the duration for which the contact occurred? All help will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Say the block initially is moving along the x-direction. You correctly calculated the initial momentum to be 0.55x3.5 kg m/s. That is the initial x-component of the momentum. Now can you find the x-component of the momentum after the kick? Knowing this and the 28o angle, can you find the y-component of the momentum after the kick?
 
kuruman said:
Say the block initially is moving along the x-direction. You correctly calculated the initial momentum to be 0.55x3.5 kg m/s. That is the initial x-component of the momentum. Now can you find the x-component of the momentum after the kick? Knowing this and the 28o angle, can you find the y-component of the momentum after the kick?

Hi Kuruman,

I'm having trouble finding the momentum of the block after the kick. I have the initial momentum and I also have the time. Don't I also need Fnet? Or do we assume that Fnet has a x component of 0?

If so then, Final Momentum = Initial Momentum +(Fnet)(t)
So Final Momentum = Initial Momentum?

Actually there was an example in the book with a puck sliding on ice and in that example they also stated that there was no change in momentum. However, I don't know if the same applies to this case.

Thank You
 
PolyFX said:
Hi Kuruman,

I'm having trouble finding the momentum of the block after the kick. I have the initial momentum and I also have the time. Don't I also need Fnet? Or do we assume that Fnet has a x component of 0?

If so then, Final Momentum = Initial Momentum +(Fnet)(t)
So Final Momentum = Initial Momentum?

Actually there was an example in the book with a puck sliding on ice and in that example they also stated that there was no change in momentum. However, I don't know if the same applies to this case.

Thank You

Note that momentum is linear and there was no net force in the direction of the block's initial motion, so that component of momentum could not have been affected. It is important that they said the force was applied perpendicularly to the motion, so that is the only momentum component that has changed. Ie., if you label the original non-zero momentum component the x-component, this component may be labelled the y- or the z-component, something perpendicular to the x-component.
Now that you know you have the x-component of the final momentum, you can use the angle and trigonometry to find the missing z-component, as they label it in your question.
 
slider142 said:
Note that momentum is linear and there was no net force in the direction of the block's initial motion, so that component of momentum could not have been affected. It is important that they said the force was applied perpendicularly to the motion, so that is the only momentum component that has changed. Ie., if you label the original non-zero momentum component the x-component, this component may be labelled the y- or the z-component, something perpendicular to the x-component.
Now that you know you have the x-component of the final momentum, you can use the angle and trigonometry to find the missing z-component, as they label it in your question.


Hi,

Well I got most parts of this question correct but I was not so lucky on others.

So far,

I have found out that the x component of the blocks momentum after the kick is 1.925
I have found out the magnitude of the momentum after the kick is 2.180
I have also found out that the magnitude of the force applied on the block was 409.4 N

However, I cannot get the z component of the unit vector in the direction of the blocks momentum after the kick nor can I get z component of the blocks momentum after the kick.

Here's how I approached the question

Since the x component of the momentum does not change and is constantly at 1.925 I drew a right angled triangle with the x component as the base. I had the angle of the direction of the block which was 28 degrees. Therefore I used the equation

Tan28 = 1.925/Z (where z is the unknown we are trying to find)

Therefore Z = approximately 1.0235

I then used the pythagorean theorem to find out the hypotenuse which was in this case the magnitude of the blocks momentum (2.180).

Thus, I got the momentum of the block after the collision to be (1.925,0,1.0235)
I then divided this vector by 2.180(to get the unit vector) and ended up with (0.883,0,0.4694). both my x and y components are correct but my z component is wrong.

To find the average force applied on the block I divided 1.0235 (z component) by the time interval and got 409.4 N as the answer.

I'm a bit baffled because if the z component that I calculated was incorrect then how did my answer for the average force on the block turn out to be correct (I used the incorrect z value in the calculations)?

Furthermore, if the magnitude and the x component that I calculated were correct. Shouldn't I be able to rearrange the pythagorean theorem to solve for Z^2? This will still yield my initial answer of 1.0235.

I guess there's always the possibility that somehow I just got lucky during the calculation for the average force?

-Thank You
 
I don't see where the question asks for the z-component of the unit momentum vector.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K