More information on the momentum eigenstate in the position basis

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hmparticle9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum mechanics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the momentum eigenstate in the position basis as described in "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd Edition). It clarifies that the notation ##| p \rangle## represents the eigenfunction of the momentum operator ##\hat{p}## with eigenvalue ##p##. Additionally, it explains that applying ##\langle x|## to ##| p \rangle## indicates the position basis representation, relying on established conventions in quantum mechanics. These conventions are critical for understanding the relationship between position and momentum states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics terminology, specifically eigenstates and eigenvalues.
  • Familiarity with Dirac notation, including kets and bras.
  • Knowledge of the momentum operator ##\hat{p}## and its role in quantum mechanics.
  • Concept of wave functions and their representations in different bases.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Fourier transform in quantum mechanics for transitioning between position and momentum representations.
  • Learn about the properties of eigenstates and eigenvalues in quantum systems.
  • Explore the concept of wave function collapse and its relation to measurement in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the role of conventions in quantum mechanics and how they affect interpretation of states and operators.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists specializing in quantum theory, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum states and their representations.

hmparticle9
Messages
157
Reaction score
26
The following sentence appears in my book (Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths (3rd Edition)) :

"## \langle x | p \rangle ## is the momentum eigenstate (with eigenvalue p) in the position basis." Page 122.

I am not sure why this is the case. I have done some digging... on a previous page (114) it says

"The momentum space wave function ##\Phi(p ,t)## is the ##p## component in the expansion of ## | S(t) \rangle ## in the basis of momentum eigenfunctions:
$$\Phi(p ,t) = \langle p | S(t) \rangle$$
(with ## | p \rangle ## standing for the eigenfunction of ##\hat{p}## with eigenvalue ##p##)"

So is it convention that ## | p \rangle ## is the eigenfunction/eigenstate of ##\hat{p}##? If that is the case then that is one problem solved.

The second problem is, why does application of ## \langle x|## to ## | p \rangle ## mean that we are taking ##| p \rangle## with respect to the position basis?

From doing some further reading it seems as though that my second question could have the same answer as the first.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The text inside a ket is merely a label, so in general we need to know what convention is being used to assign labels to know what is meant by ##|whatever\rangle##.

There are some conventions that are so commonly used and generally accepted that authors often won't bother stating them explicitly. You've just figured two of them out: unless the context tells us otherwise, ##|p\rangle## is usually the eigenket of ##\hat{p}## with eigenvalue ##p## and likewise for ##|x\rangle## and ##\hat{x}##.

The expression ##\langle x|\psi\rangle## is a number, so for a fixed ##|\psi\rangle## and variable ##x## it maps values of ##x## to numbers - which makes it a function of ##x##, the position-space representation of ##|\psi\rangle##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hmparticle9 and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
971
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K