I More information on the momentum eigenstate in the position basis

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter hmparticle9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum mechanics
Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies that the notation |p⟩ represents the eigenstate of the momentum operator ˆp with eigenvalue p, which is a widely accepted convention in quantum mechanics. It explains that the expression ⟨x|p⟩ indicates the momentum eigenstate in the position basis, as the application of ⟨x| to |p⟩ transforms it into a position-space representation. This transformation results in a function of x, mapping position values to corresponding probabilities. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding conventions in quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the labeling of states. Overall, the text emphasizes that these conventions are often assumed and not explicitly stated by authors.
hmparticle9
Messages
152
Reaction score
26
The following sentence appears in my book (Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths (3rd Edition)) :

"## \langle x | p \rangle ## is the momentum eigenstate (with eigenvalue p) in the position basis." Page 122.

I am not sure why this is the case. I have done some digging... on a previous page (114) it says

"The momentum space wave function ##\Phi(p ,t)## is the ##p## component in the expansion of ## | S(t) \rangle ## in the basis of momentum eigenfunctions:
$$\Phi(p ,t) = \langle p | S(t) \rangle$$
(with ## | p \rangle ## standing for the eigenfunction of ##\hat{p}## with eigenvalue ##p##)"

So is it convention that ## | p \rangle ## is the eigenfunction/eigenstate of ##\hat{p}##? If that is the case then that is one problem solved.

The second problem is, why does application of ## \langle x|## to ## | p \rangle ## mean that we are taking ##| p \rangle## with respect to the position basis?

From doing some further reading it seems as though that my second question could have the same answer as the first.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The text inside a ket is merely a label, so in general we need to know what convention is being used to assign labels to know what is meant by ##|whatever\rangle##.

There are some conventions that are so commonly used and generally accepted that authors often won't bother stating them explicitly. You've just figured two of them out: unless the context tells us otherwise, ##|p\rangle## is usually the eigenket of ##\hat{p}## with eigenvalue ##p## and likewise for ##|x\rangle## and ##\hat{x}##.

The expression ##\langle x|\psi\rangle## is a number, so for a fixed ##|\psi\rangle## and variable ##x## it maps values of ##x## to numbers - which makes it a function of ##x##, the position-space representation of ##|\psi\rangle##.
 
  • Like
Likes hmparticle9 and PeroK
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
687
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
594
Replies
2
Views
3K