I More information on the momentum eigenstate in the position basis

  • Thread starter Thread starter hmparticle9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum mechanics
Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies that the notation |p⟩ represents the eigenstate of the momentum operator ˆp with eigenvalue p, which is a widely accepted convention in quantum mechanics. It explains that the expression ⟨x|p⟩ indicates the momentum eigenstate in the position basis, as the application of ⟨x| to |p⟩ transforms it into a position-space representation. This transformation results in a function of x, mapping position values to corresponding probabilities. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding conventions in quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the labeling of states. Overall, the text emphasizes that these conventions are often assumed and not explicitly stated by authors.
hmparticle9
Messages
152
Reaction score
26
The following sentence appears in my book (Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths (3rd Edition)) :

"## \langle x | p \rangle ## is the momentum eigenstate (with eigenvalue p) in the position basis." Page 122.

I am not sure why this is the case. I have done some digging... on a previous page (114) it says

"The momentum space wave function ##\Phi(p ,t)## is the ##p## component in the expansion of ## | S(t) \rangle ## in the basis of momentum eigenfunctions:
$$\Phi(p ,t) = \langle p | S(t) \rangle$$
(with ## | p \rangle ## standing for the eigenfunction of ##\hat{p}## with eigenvalue ##p##)"

So is it convention that ## | p \rangle ## is the eigenfunction/eigenstate of ##\hat{p}##? If that is the case then that is one problem solved.

The second problem is, why does application of ## \langle x|## to ## | p \rangle ## mean that we are taking ##| p \rangle## with respect to the position basis?

From doing some further reading it seems as though that my second question could have the same answer as the first.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The text inside a ket is merely a label, so in general we need to know what convention is being used to assign labels to know what is meant by ##|whatever\rangle##.

There are some conventions that are so commonly used and generally accepted that authors often won't bother stating them explicitly. You've just figured two of them out: unless the context tells us otherwise, ##|p\rangle## is usually the eigenket of ##\hat{p}## with eigenvalue ##p## and likewise for ##|x\rangle## and ##\hat{x}##.

The expression ##\langle x|\psi\rangle## is a number, so for a fixed ##|\psi\rangle## and variable ##x## it maps values of ##x## to numbers - which makes it a function of ##x##, the position-space representation of ##|\psi\rangle##.
 
  • Like
Likes hmparticle9 and PeroK
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
823
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
731
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K