B More similar triangle problems

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,830
Reaction score
7,815
TL;DR Summary
Is this solution based on a valid postulate?
For the sake of argument, lets assume this is, in fact, a right triangle with a rectangle inscribed in it.

1753131065413.webp


Here is what looks like a very elegant solution:

Triangles A and B are similar
a/4=2/b
ab=8

But what is happening in that second line? Is there a property of similar triangles I'm forgetting?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you mean? Similarity causes the first line, and the second is just a multiplication by ##4\cdot b.## Are you asking why they are similar?
 
DaveC426913 said:
But what is happening in that second line? Is there a property of similar triangles I'm forgetting?
Similar triangles have corresponding sides that are in the same proportion. Therefore, a : 4 :: 2 : b, or equivalently, ##\frac a 4 = \frac 2 b##.

I wouldn't call ab = 8 a solution, though, as you haven't solved for either a or b. You can solve for a and b by computing the areas of the two internal triangles and the rectangle, and equating the sum of those areas with the area of the large triangle.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes TensorCalculus and DaveC426913
$$\frac a 4 = \frac 2 b$$
$$a = 4(\frac 2 b)$$
$$ab = 4(2) = 8$$

How ##ab=8## is a full solution I'm not sure, but hopefully laying everything out there makes everything clear.
 
Sorry. I left it off. The question is what is the area of the shaded region?

Which is why the problem is solvable.
There is not enough info to know the length of sides of the shaded area, but its area is constant.
 
  • Like
Likes TensorCalculus
It was simply the arrival at this line:
TensorCalculus said:
$$\frac a 4 = \frac 2 b$$
I can see it now, but I never would have thought of it in my own.
 
  • Like
Likes TensorCalculus
Here is the long version:

1753191248587.webp


The area of the rectangle is ##(2+a)\cdot(4+b) =8+4a+2b+ab,## so half of it is the area of the triangle. The triangle also consists of the colored areas. The yellow area is ##b,## the blue one is ##2a,## and the pink one is ##ab##. So
$$
\dfrac{1}{2}\left(8+4a+2b+ab\right)=4+2a+b+\dfrac{1}{2}ab=b+2a+ab\Longleftrightarrow 4=\dfrac{1}{2}ab\Longleftrightarrow ab=8
$$
This shows that the similarity argument is indeed the nicer one.
 
  • Informative
Likes DaveC426913
DaveC426913 said:
There is not enough info to know the length of sides of the shaded area
Sure there is. I laid out how to find the dimensions of the rectangle in post #3. Equating the areas as I described gives you a second equation in a and b, allowing one to solve for both variables.
 
Mark44 said:
Sure there is. I laid out how to find the dimensions of the rectangle in post #3. Equating the areas as I described gives you a second equation in a and b, allowing one to solve for both variables.
Write out your method and you will see you get an identity. Same for computing each triangle hypotenuse and relating them. The issue is that the problem is fundamentally undetermined as to a and b, as long as their product is 8. You can see this directly by graphically showing that e.g. 1 and 8, 2 and 4, both work.

That’s why I thought this was a cute problem. Similar to the case where you drill a hole through a sphere. No matter the sphere size, if you make the hole wide enough that the height of the resulting figure is e.g. 8, the volume of what’s left is independent of sphere size.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Mark44 said:
Sure there is. I laid out how to find the dimensions of the rectangle in post #3. Equating the areas as I described gives you a second equation in a and b, allowing one to solve for both variables.
Right. I must have misintuited the problem. At first, I was thinking the ratio of sides of the rectangle were undefined - that the rectangle could change shape but not area.
 
  • #11
DaveC426913 said:
Right. I must have misintuited the problem. At first, I was thinking the ratio of sides of the rectangle were undefined - that the rectangle could change shape but not area.
Your first instinct is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
  • #12
Exercise for the reader: calling the 4 and 2 segments c and d, show that for a given rectangle area A, any choice of a and b, with ab=A, and independently, any choice of c and d with cd=A, leads to a valid instance of rectangle inscribed in a right triangle.
 
  • #13
DaveC426913 said:
At first, I was thinking the ratio of sides of the rectangle were undefined - that the rectangle could change shape but not area.
If all you have is the relationship ab = 8 for the rectangle, then you can't get a unique solution for the sides a and b. But as I laid out, developing another equation nails down the dimensions of the rectangle.
 
  • #14
DaveC426913 said:
At first, I was thinking the ratio of sides of the rectangle were undefined - that the rectangle could change shape but not area.
If all you have is the relationship ab = 8 for the rectangle, then you can't get a unique solution for the sides a and b. But as I laid out, developing another equation nails down the dimensions of the rectangle.
 
  • #15
PAllen said:
Write out your method and you will see you get an identity.
I wrote out my two equations but did not get an identity. I ended up with solutions of a = 4 and b = 2. I checked my work and found that these numbers satisfied both equations; i.e., that ab = 8 and that the sum of the three areas was 18.

If I made a mistake, I'm away from the house until tomorrow and am without paper and pen, so unable to recreate my equations.
 
  • #16
Mark44 said:
I wrote out my two equations but did not get an identity. I ended up with solutions of a = 4 and b = 2. I checked my work and found that these numbers satisfied both equations; i.e., that ab = 8 and that the sum of the three areas was 18.

If I made a mistake, I'm away from the house until tomorrow and am without paper and pen, so unable to recreate my equations.
Here it is worked out:

Sum of small triangles plus rectangle = large triangle

$$\frac {1}{2}4a + \frac{1}{2}2b + ab = \frac{1}{2}(4+b)(2+a)$$

simplify a little:

$$2a+b+ab=4+b+2a+ab/2$$

Substitute ##b=8/a## and simplify:

$$2a+8/a+8=8+8/a+2a$$

an identity, leading to ##0=0##.

Using big hypotenuse = sum of smaller hypotenuses also leads to an identity. There is no more information, because the exercise I posted in #12 is straightforward to prove.
 
  • #17
I don't have my work in front of me, but it appears I've made an error.
 

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top