Most Influential Paper fourth quarter 2006

  • Thread starter marcus
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Paper
In summary, the most influential paper of the fourth quarter of 2006 was "The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future" by Kevin Kelly. This paper discusses the 12 technological forces that are shaping our future, such as artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and the sharing economy. It also explores how these forces will impact our lives and society as a whole. The paper has been widely cited and referenced in discussions about the future of technology and its role in shaping our world. Overall, it has had a significant influence on our understanding of the impact of technology on our lives.

Which of these recent papers will prove most valuable to future research?

  • Alexandrov, Buffenoir and Roche

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Freidel, Kowalski-Glikman and Nowak

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
The following background independent QG preprints appeared October through December 2006. Which of these do you expect to have the greatest impact on future research?

============

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0610241
Gravity and the standard model with neutrino mixing
Ali H. Chamseddine, Alain Connes, Matilde Marcolli
71 pages, 7 figures

"We present an effective unified theory based on noncommutative geometry for the standard model with neutrino mixing, minimally coupled to gravity. The unification is based on the symplectic unitary group in Hilbert space and on the spectral action. It yields all the detailed structure of the standard model with several predictions at unification scale. Besides the familiar predictions for the gauge couplings as for GUT theories, it predicts the Higgs scattering parameter and the sum of the squares of Yukawa couplings. From these relations one can extract predictions at low energy, giving in particular a Higgs mass around 170 GeV and a top mass compatible with present experimental value. The geometric picture that emerges is that space-time is the product of an ordinary spin manifold (for which the theory would deliver Einstein gravity) by a finite noncommutative geometry F. The discrete space F is of KO-dimension 6 modulo 8 and of metric dimension 0, and accounts for all the intricacies of the standard model with its spontaneous symmetry breaking Higgs sector."

=======================

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0611042
Hidden Quantum Gravity in 4d Feynman diagrams: Emergence of spin foams
Aristide Baratin, Laurent Freidel
28 pages, 7 figures

"We show how Feynman amplitudes of standard QFT on flat and homogeneous space can naturally be recast as the evaluation of observables for a specific spin foam model, which provides dynamics for the background geometry. We identify the symmetries of this Feynman graph spin foam model and give the gauge-fixing prescriptions. We also show that the gauge-fixed partition function is invariant under Pachner moves of the triangulation, and thus defines an invariant of four-dimensional manifolds. Finally, we investigate the algebraic structure of the model, and discuss its relation with a quantization of 4d gravity in the limit where the Newton constant goes to zero."

===================

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0611154
MacDowell-Mansouri gravity and Cartan geometry
Derek K. Wise
34 pages, 5 figures

"The geometric content of the MacDowell-Mansouri formulation of general relativity is best understood in terms of Cartan geometry. In particular, Cartan geometry gives clear geometric meaning to the MacDowell-Mansouri trick of combining the Levi-Civita connection and coframe field, or soldering form, into a single physical field. The Cartan perspective allows us to view physical spacetime as tangentially approximated by an arbitrary homogeneous 'model spacetime', including not only the flat Minkowski model, as is implicitly used in standard general relativity, but also de Sitter, anti de Sitter, or other models. A 'Cartan connection' gives a prescription for parallel transport from one 'tangent model spacetime' to another, along any path, giving a natural interpretation of the MacDowell-Mansouri connection as 'rolling' the model spacetime along physical spacetime. I explain Cartan geometry, and 'Cartan gauge theory', in which the gauge field is replaced by a Cartan connection. In particular, I discuss MacDowell-Mansouri gravity, as well as its recent reformulation in terms of BF theory, in the context of Cartan geometry."

====================

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0612071
Plebanski Theory and Covariant Canonical Formulation
Sergei Alexandrov, Eric Buffenoir, Philippe Roche
18 pages

"We establish an equivalence between the Hamiltonian formulation of the Plebanski action for general relativity and the covariant canonical formulation of the Hilbert-Palatini action. This is done by comparing the symplectic structures of the two theories through the computation of Dirac brackets. We also construct a shifted connection with simplified Dirac brackets, playing an important role in the covariant loop quantization program, in the Plebanski framework. Implications for spin foam models are also discussed."

================

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0612170
From noncommutative kappa-Minkowski to Minkowski space-time
Laurent Freidel, Jerzy Kowalski-Glikman, Sebastian Nowak
6 pages

"We show that free kappa-Minkowski space field theory is equivalent to a relativistically invariant, non local, free field theory on Minkowski space-time. The field theory we obtain has in spectrum a relativistic mode of arbitrary mass m and a Planck mass tachyon. We show that while the energy momentum for the relativistic mode is essentially the standard one, it diverges for the tachyon, so that there are no asymptotic tachyonic states in the theory. It also follows that the dispersion relation is not modified, so that, in particular, in this theory the speed of light is energy-independent."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
As a way of getting an overview of QG directions and progress during the year, I'll list the papers from the quarterly polls. My personal opinion is that Wise paper is the most revolutionary, because it promotes the idea that we ought to get away from flat tangentspace and completely rebuild differential geometry Cartan-style.

Differential geometry is fundamentally the way humans model spacetime
it is the workshop where we keep our idea of the CONTINUUM and tinker with it. If you propose that the tangentspace at every point should no longer be a vectorspace, but should embody a "lambda" or cosmo parameter. If you propose that the tangentspace should be the quotient of two Liegroups G/H (which Cartan apparently did and Wise is echoing and ampllifying) then you are screwing around with the idea of the continuum bigtime. Also the Wise paper is very easy to read compared to some others. So I think it is the most fun and revolutionary of all the 2006 QG papers.

But that is just my personal view of it. So I urge anybody else who follows current background independent QG research to propose what you think is most revolutionary: PLEASE ADD TO THE LIST if you have other B.I. QG favorites. I am going to list, just as a suggestion of the kind of thing you could pick from, what was on our polls.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
====first quarter poll====

Abhay Ashtekar
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0604013
Quantum Nature of the Big Bang: An Analytical and Numerical Investigation I

John Baez et al
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0603085
Exotic Statistics for Loops in 4d BF Theory

Louis Crane
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0602120
Categorical Geometry and the Mathematical Foundations of Quantum General Relativity

Laurent Freidel et al
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0604016
Hidden Quantum Gravity in 3d Feynman diagrams

Gerard 't Hooft
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0604008
The mathematical basis for deterministic quantum mechanics

Thanu Padmanabhan
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603114
Dark Energy: Mystery of the Millennium

====second quarter poll====

1. one by Padmanabhan
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0606061
Gravity: A New Holographic Perspective
T. Padmanabhan

2. two by Rovelli
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0604044
Graviton propagator in loop quantum gravity
Eugenio Bianchi, Leonardo Modesto, Carlo Rovelli, Simone Speziale
http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/0604064
Relational EPR
Matteo Smerlak, Carlo Rovelli

3. two by Ashtekar
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0605011
Gravity, Geometry and the Quantum
Abhay Ashtekar
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0602086
Quantum Nature of the Big Bang
Abhay Ashtekar, Tomasz Pawlowski, Parampreet Singh

4. two by Baez
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0605087
Quantization of strings and branes coupled to BF theory
John C. Baez, Alejandro Perez
http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DG/0511710
Higher Gauge Theory
John C. Baez, Urs Schreiber

5. three by Majid
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0604132
Algebraic approach to quantum gravity III: noncommmutative Riemannian geometry
Shahn Majid
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0604130
Algebraic approach to quantum gravity II: noncommutative spacetime
Shahn Majid
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0601004
Noncommutative Harmonic Analysis, Sampling Theory and the Duflo Map in 2+1 Quantum Gravity
L. Freidel, S. Majid

====third quarter poll====

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0608221
A Lorentzian version of the non-commutative geometry of the standard model of particle physics
John Barrett

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0608226
Noncommutative Geometry and the standard model with neutrino mixing
Alain Connes

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0607014
Particles as Wilson lines of gravitational field
Laurent Freidel, Jerzy Kowalski-Glikman, Artem Starodubtsev

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0608243
Relational physics with real rods and clocks and the measurement problem of quantum mechanics
Rodolfo Gambini, Jorge Pullin

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609109
Could quantum mechanics be an approximation to another theory?
Lee Smolin

====fourth quarter poll====

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0610241
Gravity and the standard model with neutrino mixing
Ali H. Chamseddine, Alain Connes, Matilde Marcolli

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0611042
Hidden Quantum Gravity in 4d Feynman diagrams: Emergence of spin foams
Aristide Baratin, Laurent Freidel

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0611154
MacDowell-Mansouri gravity and Cartan geometry
Derek K. Wise

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0612071
Plebanski Theory and Covariant Canonical Formulation
Sergei Alexandrov, Eric Buffenoir, Philippe Roche

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0612170
From noncommutative kappa-Minkowski to Minkowski space-time
Laurent Freidel, Jerzy Kowalski-Glikman, Sebastian Nowak
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Hi Marcus,

This list is a great snapshot on research directions in quantum gravity this year. Thanks for providing it.

Happy 2007.

Christine
 
  • #5
ccdantas said:
Hi Marcus,

This list is a great snapshot on research directions in quantum gravity this year. Thanks for providing it.

Happy 2007.

Christine

Happy 2007 to you too, Christine!

You are the adept of that skill (delineating QG and making directions visible). The righthand margin of your blog always had the seeds of an overall QG survey-with-highlights. That blog made a real contribution.Here I am not sure we have an adequate snapshot quite yet :smile:. What I am asking for is other people's ideas, and other people's picks of significant research to watch.

this list AFAIK is just what somehow accumulated thru the operation of no great wisdom. But yeah! maybe it does serve as a reminder of some of the active research directions today. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Hi Marcus,

I think you are an excellent observer on what is currently going on in quantum gravity research, but not only that. You are able to understand -- at a level good enough to see the "grand scheme of things" in the various subfields -- and analyse the trends, impacts, trace the various collaborations involving the young and experienced researchers alike. And you also spend a good deal of time actually studying some of these investigations in a deep level.

Quantum gravity is exceedingly fascinating to me.

Best wishes
Christine
 

1. What is the "Most Influential Paper fourth quarter 2006"?

The "Most Influential Paper fourth quarter 2006" refers to a scientific paper that was deemed to have the greatest impact or influence in the field of research during the last quarter of 2006.

2. How is the "Most Influential Paper fourth quarter 2006" chosen?

The selection process for the "Most Influential Paper fourth quarter 2006" varies depending on the organization or institution. It may be chosen based on the number of citations, impact factor, or significance of the findings.

3. Who decides the "Most Influential Paper fourth quarter 2006"?

The "Most Influential Paper fourth quarter 2006" may be decided by a committee or panel of experts in the field, a group of researchers, or a specific organization or journal.

4. Can a paper be considered for the "Most Influential Paper fourth quarter 2006" if it was published in a different year?

Yes, a paper can still be considered for the "Most Influential Paper fourth quarter 2006" even if it was published in a different year. The time frame for the selection may vary depending on the organization or institution.

5. Is the "Most Influential Paper fourth quarter 2006" limited to a specific field of research?

No, the "Most Influential Paper fourth quarter 2006" can cover a wide range of fields and disciplines. It can be in the natural sciences, social sciences, or humanities, as long as it has had a significant impact on the scientific community.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
826
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top