Motion of an Element: Understand Rheology Notes

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter renlok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Motion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of velocity components in a fluid using rheological principles. The initial equation for the velocity component at point Q, given neighboring point P, is established as $$u_Q = u_P + \frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{x}}\Delta{x} + \frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{y}}\Delta{y} + \frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{z}}\Delta{z}$$. The complexity arises with the subsequent equation, which introduces additional terms and appears to involve a cross product. The author is seeking clarity on the derivation and implications of this more complex expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic fluid mechanics
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of rheological properties and their mathematical representations
  • Experience with vector calculus and cross products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of velocity components in fluid dynamics using the Navier-Stokes equations
  • Learn about the application of partial derivatives in fluid mechanics
  • Research the significance of cross products in vector calculus
  • Explore advanced topics in rheology, focusing on non-Newtonian fluid behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid mechanics, rheology researchers, and engineers working with fluid dynamics who seek to deepen their understanding of velocity field derivations in complex fluids.

renlok
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm working through my rheology notes and there is a fairly basic part that I don't understand at all.

If you have two neighbouring points in a liquid P(x,y,z) and $$Q(x + \Delta{x}, y + \Delta{y}, z + \Delta{z})$$ now if the velocity components of P are given as (u, v, w) then $$u_Q = u_P + \frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{x}}\Delta{x} + \frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{y}}\Delta{y} + \frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{z}}\Delta{z}$$ which i understand its a quite simple derivation and we have similar equations of v & w

But then he just goes on to say

"Then $$u_Q = u_P + \frac{1}{2}(\frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{z}} - \frac{\delta{w}}{\delta{x}})\Delta{z} - \frac{1}{2}(\frac{\delta{v}}{\delta{x}}-\frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{y}})\Delta{y} + \frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{x}}\Delta{x} + \frac{1}{2}(\frac{ \delta {u}}{\delta {y}}+\frac{\delta {v}}{ \delta {x} })\Delta{y} + \frac{1}{2}(\frac{\delta{u}}{\delta {z}}+\frac{ \delta {w}}{\delta{x}})\Delta{z}$$"

which i don't understand what this is let alone how it was derived I also couldn't find it anywhere on the net

Cheers for any insight you may have
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
renlok said:
I'm working through my rheology notes and there is a fairly basic part that I don't understand at all.

If you have two neighbouring points in a liquid P(x,y,z) and $$Q(x + \Delta{x}, y + \Delta{y}, z + \Delta{z})$$ now if the velocity components of P are given as (u, v, w) then $$u_Q = u_P + \frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{x}}\Delta{x} + \frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{y}}\Delta{y} + \frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{z}}\Delta{z}$$ which i understand its a quite simple derivation and we have similar equations of v & w

But then he just goes on to say

"Then $$u_Q = u_P + \frac{1}{2}(\frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{z}} - \frac{\delta{w}}{\delta{x}})\Delta{z} - \frac{1}{2}(\frac{\delta{v}}{\delta{x}}-\frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{y}})\Delta{y} + \frac{\delta{u}}{\delta{x}}\Delta{x} + \frac{1}{2}(\frac{\delta {u}}{\delta {y}}+\frac{\delta {v}}{\delta {x}})\Delta{y} + \frac{1}{2}(\frac{\delta {u}}{\delta {z}}+\frac{\delta {w}}{\delta {x}})\Delta{z}$$"

which i don't understand what this is let alone how it was derived I also couldn't find it anywhere on the net

Cheers for any insight you may have

I'll take a crack at it. All the author has done to get this last line is to add and subtract various elements. If you simplify this last line, you get the earlier line. This step must be a setup: the author must be trying to recognize this more complicated expression as something else - it looks to me like a cross product, but without more context, I don't know what it is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K