Motivating Matrix Addition/Multiplication Without Appealing to Linear Maps

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bacle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Matrices
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how to motivate the definitions of matrix addition and multiplication without relying on the concept of linear maps. Participants explore alternative perspectives, particularly in the context of teaching linear algebra where matrices are primarily used to represent systems of linear equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using equations to illustrate matrix addition and multiplication, noting that if Ax = p and Bx = q, then (A+B)x = (p + q) could serve as a motivation.
  • Another participant argues that the addition example is not artificial, as it can be derived from rewriting equations in a linear system and simplifying them.
  • A different approach is proposed where matrices are viewed as abstract representations of systems of equations, with a detailed breakdown of how to express the addition of equations in matrix form.
  • One participant mentions the complexity of motivating matrix multiplication and references a separate thread for further exploration of that topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various perspectives on how to motivate matrix operations, indicating that there is no consensus on a singular approach. Multiple competing views on the effectiveness of different methods remain present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the challenge of motivating matrix operations without relying on established concepts like linear maps, which may limit the scope of the proposed methods. There is also an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in explaining matrix multiplication.

Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
Hi, Everyone:

In linear algebra courses, the defs/formulas for
the sum, multiplication of matrices respectively,
are often motivated by the fact that matrix addition
models the point-wise addition of linear maps, i.e.,
If A,B are linear maps described on the same basis, then
the sum (a_ij)+(b_ij) describes the linear operator:

(A+B)(x)=A(x)+B(x)

And AB models the composition of the operators A,B;
i.e., A*B(x) =A( B(x)).

Now, I am teaching a class in which matrices have,
so far, been used only to represent systems of linear
equations. Does anyone know how to motivate the
definitions A+B and AB from this or a related
perspective?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You could use the same basic ideas expressed as equations.

If Ax = p and Bx = q, then (A+B)x = (p + q)
If Ax = y and By = z, then BAx = z

The addition example seems a bit artificial, but most students will probably "buy" matrix addition by analogy with scalar addition.

The multiplication example is (fortunately) more realistic. You can invent "word problems" where two sets of equations can be combined and solved this way.
 


The addition is not that artificial - you rewrite some of the equations in the linear system - then add/subtract from your original system to get a simplification.
 


I'll write the number 2 as 02, and 3 as 03 etc.. just to make things look pretty on this page.

I think you could begin by explaining how the matrix on the left comes from considering that
system of equations on the right. You could motivate the definition by explaining how a
matrix is an abstract representation of that system of equations first.

|01 02 03 04| - 01x + 02y + 03z + 04w
|05 06 07 08| - 05x + 06y + 07z + 08w
|09 10 11 12| - 09x + 10y + 11z + 12w
|13 14 15 16| - 13x + 14y + 15z + 16w

You get the idea, the - on every line is typographical...Then explain that an equation like 01x + 02y + 03z + 04w could be perceived as coming
from adding two different equations as follows:

_00x + 01y + 01z + 02w
+01x + 01y + 02z + 02w
------------------------
(00 + 01)x + (01 + 01)y + (01 + 02)z + (02 + 02)w

so

(00 + 01)x + (01 + 01)y + (01 + 02)z + (02 + 02)w = 01x + 02y + 03z + 04w.

We can rewrite the whole system in this way:

|(00 + 01) (01 + 01) (01 + 02) (02 + 02)| - (00 + 01)x + (01 + 01)y + (01 + 02)z + (02 + 02)w
|(03 + 02) (03 + 02) (03 + 04) (04 + 04)| - (03 + 02)x + (03 + 03)y + (03 + 04)z + (04 + 04)w

I won't do all four as you get the idea.

So we have

|01 02 03 04| = |(00 + 01) (01 + 01) (01 + 02) (02 + 02)| = |00 01 01 02| + |01 01 02 02|
|05 06 07 08| = |(03 + 02) (03 + 02) (03 + 04) (04 + 04)| = |03 03 03 04| + |02 03 04 04|

and you can see that the definition of matrix addition follows. Obviously the last equality
should be approached starting from the perspective of two systems of equations where
you just show they have the same solution and show that there's no reason not to define
things this way because everything has the same solution set...

As for matrix multiplication that's a big question, you might enjoy reading my thread here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=451822
as I tried to figure this question out and eventually got a few separate and equally
satisfying answers. From post 6 on is where I wrote the ideas, the early posts are just
me being confused.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K