Mounting fire / smoke alarms with magnets

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and safety of using magnets to mount smoke detectors. Participants explore concerns about the potential effects of heat and smoke on magnet performance, the functionality of different types of smoke detectors, and the implications of using various magnet designs in this application.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the safety of using magnets for smoke detector installation, questioning whether the magnets could detach during a fire or interfere with smoke detection.
  • Another participant explains that magnets will release when the temperature exceeds the curie point, which is expected to occur after the smoke detector has already activated.
  • There is a discussion about the differences between photoelectric and ionization smoke detectors, with some suggesting that photoelectric detectors are less likely to be affected by magnetic fields.
  • Participants suggest using magnets with a closed magnetic path, such as horseshoe magnets, to minimize potential issues.
  • One participant inquires about the pros and cons of using flat cylindrical magnets versus regular magnets, seeking clarification on how magnet design might impact performance.
  • Concerns are raised about the presence of stray magnetic fields affecting inductive components in the smoke detector's circuitry.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the smoke detector should activate well before temperatures reach critical levels, reiterating the importance of timely alarms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the smoke detector should activate before reaching critical temperatures, but there is no consensus on the best type of magnet to use or the potential effects of magnetic fields on detector performance. Multiple competing views regarding the safety and functionality of different smoke detector types and magnet designs remain present.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of magnet types and the potential for varying performance based on the specific smoke detector model used. There are unresolved questions about the impact of stray magnetic fields on the smoke detector's circuitry.

Franly
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
I am building a detachable smoke detector that I'm planning to install with magnets. I am concerned about the safety using this method, because of my knowledge of how magnets react to / affect heat and smoke. I wouldn't risk having the alarm detach itself during a fire, or the magnet to interfere with the smoke. Can someone here explain to me whether this would be a viable solution or not?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
The magnet will release when the temperature of the magnet, or the magnetic material the magnet is attracted to, exceeds the curie point. The plastic case will have melted long before that will happen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curie_temperature

Might the presence of the magnets prevent the detector functioning? The magnetic field will be largely restricted to the magnetic path of the attachment, so it is unlikely.

Photoelectric detectors sense smoke early, while ionisation detectors sense the product of later flame.
There should be no problem if you use a photoelectric detector as they should be immune to magnetic fields.

Ionisation detectors may be effected since the path taken by a charged particle will be influenced by magnetic fields. But the balanced ionisation chambers will probably cancel any magnetic distortion. Depending on jurisdiction, a smoke detector may be prohibited if it has a replaceable battery, or employs an ionisation detector.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and Franly
To minimize potential problems, just be sure to use a magnet that has a closed magnetic path when attached to the ferrous metal surface. Horseshoe magnets (regular or cylindrical) have this property, for example.

BTW, not many walls have ferrous metal in them (unless this application is for a ship). Are you intending to attach this detector to some metal appliance like a refrigerator or dishwasher?

Cylindrical Horseshoe Magnet:

https://www.imagnetshop.com/661-large_default/19-ima731.jpg

1576679076408.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Franly
To fulfill its mission, the device should give the alarm long before the temperature becomes hot enough to reach the curie temperature, or hot enough to melt the plastic. After the alarm is given and the people (hopefully) evacuate, nobody cares if the smoke alarm keeps beeping as the structure burns.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Franly
Baluncore said:
Welcome to PF.
The magnet will release when the temperature of the magnet, or the magnetic material the magnet is attracted to, exceeds the curie point. The plastic case will have melted long before that will happen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curie_temperature

Might the presence of the magnets prevent the detector functioning? The magnetic field will be largely restricted to the magnetic path of the attachment, so it is unlikely.

Photoelectric detectors sense smoke early, while ionisation detectors sense the product of later flame.
There should be no problem if you use a photoelectric detector as they should be immune to magnetic fields.

Ionisation detectors may be effected since the path taken by a charged particle will be influenced by magnetic fields. But the balanced ionisation chambers will probably cancel any magnetic distortion. Depending on jurisdiction, a smoke detector may be prohibited if it has a replaceable battery, or employs an ionisation detector.
Thanks, both for the welcome and the thorough answer!

Correct me if I'm wrong, what I get from this is that as long as I use a photoelectric detector, the magnets won't influence the detection performance and the magnets will hold until they exceed the curie point - which means that it will be long after a fire alarm has served its purpose and would have melted anyway?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
berkeman said:
To minimize potential problems, just be sure to use a magnet that has a closed magnetic path when attached to the ferrous metal surface. Horseshoe magnets (regular or cylindrical) have this property, for example.

BTW, not many walls have ferrous metal in them (unless this application is for a ship). Are you intending to attach this detector to some metal appliance like a refrigerator or dishwasher?
I was actually intending to use a flat cylindrical magnet, but didn't know that it would minimize potential problems. Could you please elaborate on this, explaining me what pro's and con's there would be using a "normal" magnet to a cylindrical one?

I intend to have a ceiling plate attached with screws. This plate is equipped with the magnet that the detector attaches to.
 
anorlunda said:
To fulfill its mission, the device should give the alarm long before the temperature becomes hot enough to reach the curie temperature, or hot enough to melt the plastic. After the alarm is given and the people (hopefully) evacuate, nobody cares if the smoke alarm keeps beeping as the structure burns.
Great point, thanks!
 
Franly said:
I was actually intending to use a flat cylindrical magnet, but didn't know that it would minimize potential problems. Could you please elaborate on this, explaining me what pro's and con's there would be using a "normal" magnet to a cylindrical one?
The important point is that the magnetic field be confined to the magnet and the ferrous plate it is stuck to, and that the external fringe field is very small. If there are any inductive components in your circuit (inductors, cores, etc.) that use ferrite in their construction, external stray DC magnetic fields can alter their performance and potentially cause the circuit to not work well or fail altogether.

Horseshoe shaped magnets have such a property when they are attached to a ferrous surface. "Horseshoe" magnets come in different configurations, from the traditional U-shaped version to the cylindrical version that I posted a picture of. You can also get cylindrical magnets where the two poles are coaxial, with a center pole surrounded by a peripheral pole:

https://www.magnetics.com/product.asp?ProductID=42

1576690352066.png


While a "horseshoe" type magnet is not attached to anything, there are still stray fields that can interfere with the operation of inductive circuits that contain ferrite. I don't know if that's an issue in your appliation or not. One solution to that is to add a "keeper" piece of ferrous metal that attaches to the magnet on the product when it is not mounted on anything.

Field when not attached to anything:

https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites...5/hsmagnet-142sair-e1547587903347-300x300.jpg

1576690504872.png


Field when attached to ferrous metal:

https://www.kjmagnetics.com/blog.asp?p=why-horseshoes

1576690609230.png


Compared to the external stray field of a regular bar magnet (yikes!):

1576690799712.png
 
anorlunda said:
To fulfill its mission, the device should give the alarm long before the temperature becomes hot enough to reach the curie temperature

The Curie temperature for iron is 1400F. By that point, I would hope everyone is already out of the building.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic, davenn and anorlunda

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
5K