Multiplying ψ* in Quantum Mechanics: Understanding Probability Density

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sciboudy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessity of multiplying the wave function ψ by its complex conjugate ψ* in quantum mechanics to derive the probability density. Participants explore the mathematical and conceptual implications of this operation, including its relation to complex numbers and the interpretation of quantum states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that multiplying ψ by ψ* yields a real number necessary for defining probability density.
  • Others argue that using the complex conjugate is a mathematical requirement for obtaining the norm squared of a complex number, which relates to measuring probabilities.
  • A participant mentions that the interpretation of ψ as a probability amplitude, as proposed by Max Born, supports the use of ψ*ψ for probability density.
  • Some contributions highlight that the multiplication of a complex number by its conjugate is a general property of complex numbers, not exclusive to quantum mechanics.
  • There are discussions about the implications of complex numbers in quantum mechanics, including their role in superpositions and transformations of quantum states.
  • A participant references Gleason's Theorem as a foundational reason for the necessity of complex conjugation in defining probabilities in quantum mechanics.
  • Some participants note that in certain cases, such as the infinite square well, the wave function can be real-valued, making the complex conjugation unnecessary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the necessity and implications of using complex conjugates in quantum mechanics. While some points about the mathematical properties of complex numbers are acknowledged, the discussion remains unresolved on the broader implications and interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of the role of complex numbers in quantum mechanics and the conditions under which the wave function can be real-valued. Some mathematical steps and assumptions are not fully explored, leaving certain aspects of the discussion open-ended.

sciboudy
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
why in the quantum mechanics we must multiply ψ by ψ*

why we must multiply in the conjugate to find the probability density ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
using anything else will leave you with a complex result. Using the psi* gets you a real number.
 
so why is the probabiblty density = epsi in epsi*
 
and why is the probability density equal to multiply OF epsi it self
 
perhaps this wikipedia article can explain it better:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrödinger_equation

Part way down in the historical background section, the article mentions that Max Born interpreted the psi function as a probability amplitude which led to interpreting the psi*psi as the probability density something that physicists could measure in a system.
 
Multiplying by the complex conjugate gives you the norm squared. If you represent a complex number by the amplitude and phase, then multiplying by the complex conjugate is basically throwing away the phase information. We can't really measure the phase, only differences in phase. The phase is sort of a bookkeeping mechanism for keeping track of quantum interference.
 
thank you khashishi and jedishrfu i will read the article
 
That isn't a quantum mechanics thing, it's a complex numbers thing. The magnitude of a complex number is given by z^* z not z^2. Think about it, if instead of a complex number I thought of z as a 2-dimensional vector, an x and y coordinate (the y is the complex part). Then the, euclidian, distance from the origin would be x^2+y^2. So for a complex number a+bi you might think the "distance" from the origin to the point in the complex plane is simply (a)^2+(bi)^2 but that's really a^2-b^2. In order to get the usual distance we need (a+bi)(a-bi)=a^2+b^2+abi-abi = a^2+b^2.

The same is equally as true for a complex function. This isn't quantum mechanics it's just the math of complex numbers. In general the use of i in quantum mechanics is a bit of a misdirect for a lot of new students, and this isn't helped by many teachers making it seem mysterious. In reality the role of complex numbers in quantum mechanics is similar to simply saying they there isn't ONE complex equation (the Schrödinger equation) which must be followed but in fact two REAL equations. Indeed you can write all of quantum mechanics in such a way that complex numbers don't appear.
 
thank you sir but what is the usage of complex in Q m and why we need it ? and what happen if Q. M don't contain complex numbers
 
  • #10
sciboudy said:
thank you sir but what is the usage of complex in Q m and why we need it ? and what happen if Q. M don't contain complex numbers

You need complex numbers to have infinitesimal displacements of apparatus used to observe systems. Such a displacement does not alter the laws of physics which, without spelling out the detail, means superpositions and lengths are preserved. For definiteness suppose you displace it by an infinitesimal distance dx then the whole quantum vector space is transformed by an operator of the form 1 + Udx where U is a linear operator - it must be linear since superpositions are preserved. Since lengths are preserved we have that 1 + Udx must be unitary which means (1 + Udx)(1 + U(bar)dx) = 1 which implies U = -U(bar) which means U is pure imaginary ie you must use complex numbers.

Why do we multiply by the complex conjugate to get probabilities - its because of a very important theorem called Gleasons Theorem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleason's_theorem

Basically it follows from some very reasonable assumptions about the probabilities we can define on a complex vector space.

Sorry that the answer is mathematical and requires some linear algebra but its unfortunately in the nature of the beast.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • #11
thank you bill
 
  • #12
sciboudy said:
why in the quantum mechanics we must multiply ψ by ψ*

why we must multiply in the conjugate to find the probability density ?

Because ψ*ψ represents probability density, which is a real quantity. It is know that product of a complex number with its conjugate gives a real quantity.
 
  • #13
  • #14
A general inner product on some L^{2} space between two functions f and g is written as (f | g ) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f^{*}g\, dx. The complex conjugation is so that the norm of a function is real valued, i.e. the magnitude of a vector (or function) is real. There are some cases within QM where \psi (x) is real valued, such as the infinite square well wave functions, in which case the complex conjugation is unnecessary.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K