Mutual Inductance of Coaxial Coils: Is M12 Always Equal to M21?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that for coaxial coils, the mutual inductance M12 is always equal to M21, as established by energy arguments. Specifically, M21 can be expressed as M21 = N2A2μn1, where N2 is the number of turns in coil 2, A2 is the area of coil 2, and μ is the permeability of the medium. The flux generated by coil 2 is nearly identical to that of coil 1, supporting the conclusion that M12 = M21 holds true across various configurations of coaxial coils.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mutual inductance concepts
  • Familiarity with coaxial coil configurations
  • Knowledge of magnetic flux and its calculations
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of mutual inductance for different coil configurations
  • Explore the energy argument approach in electromagnetism
  • Learn about the impact of coil geometry on mutual inductance
  • Investigate the role of permeability in magnetic coupling
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone studying electromagnetic theory, particularly those focused on inductive coupling and coil design.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Not sure if I'm correct or wrong..because usually M12 = M21

The Attempt at a Solution



Here coil 1 and coil 2 are coaxial, with coil 2 being shorter and having smaller area.

257lu8x.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
M21 always = M12. That can be shown by an energy argument.

It's correct I think to say that
M21 = N2phi1/i1. That computes to
M21 = N2A2μn1
where N2 is the number of turns in the inside coil 2. This agrees with your expression of M12 (I think you reverse the conventional sequence of the subscripts, but OK).

This is because the flux inside coil 2 is clearly very nearly the same as that inside coil 1.

It's more difficult to argue in the same manner to derive M12 because the question is how much of the flux generated by coil 2 really couples into coil 1.

The answer however has to be such that M12 = M21. I have looked at several derivations of mutual inductance of various coil configurations and in each case they pick the easier computation for Mij and then assume (correctly) that Mji = Mij.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K