My proof that the square root of 2 multiplied by r is irrational

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The proof demonstrates that the product of a rational number r and the square root of 2 is irrational, using a proof by contradiction. The proof begins with the assumption that r√2 is rational, leading to a series of algebraic manipulations that ultimately reveal a contradiction regarding the parity of integers x and y. Key variables include r (rational), m, n (integers), and the proof relies on the established fact that √2 is irrational. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in stating variable restrictions and the importance of ensuring that variables are not zero during division.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of proof by contradiction
  • Familiarity with the properties of rational and irrational numbers
  • Basic algebraic manipulation involving integers
  • Knowledge of the irrationality of √2
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of rational and irrational numbers in depth
  • Learn about the structure and requirements of proof by contradiction
  • Explore the properties of integers and their parity
  • Review simpler proofs of irrationality, such as the proof of √2
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding proofs and the properties of rational and irrational numbers.

airbusman
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Here it is, for you to critique. This is a proof by contradiction. This is a good example of how I usually go about doing proofs, so if you give me tips on how to improve this particular proof, I'll be able to improve all my other proofs.

I just learned how to do proof by contradiction yesterday, so forgive any ugliness in my proof.

Homework Statement



1) Prove: r√2 is irrational, where r is rational and r ≠ 0

variables involved:

r, rational
m, integer
n, integer
a, integer
b, integer
a', integer
b' integer
x, integer
y, integer

Homework Equations



Knowledge of the proof that √2 is irrational was used. That is all.

The Attempt at a Solution



1) r√2 = (m/n)√2 = a/b (this is assuming that Q in the implication P→Q is negated, which is the basis of the proof by contradiction)

2) (m√2)/n = 2a'/2b' = a'/b'

a'/b' = x/y, where at least one of x or y is odd (this is where the contradiction will lie later on)

3) (m√2)/n = x/y

m√2 = xn/y

√2 = xn/ym

2 = ((x^2)(n^2))/((y^2)(m^2))

2y^2m^2 = x^2n^2

.....after solving for x.....

x^2 is even therefore x is even

4) x = 2k

2y^2m^2/n^2 = 4k^2

.....after solving for y....

y^2 is even so y is even

So there is a contradiction; both x and y are even when at least one of x or y should be odd. Therefore, the statement that was required to be proved is true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a much simpler proof. Hint: the product (or quotient) of two rational numbers is rational.

(I didn't look carefully at your proof as it's way more complicated that it needs to be.)
 
I would recommend writing your proof as a narrative, giving explicit information about what you are doing.

I think you need to state that ##n \neq 0##, ##b \neq 0##, etc. Or, ##m, n, a, b \in \mathbb{Z}^*##. I understand the restrictions on the variables contextually, but I like to be certain when dividing by a variable that I am not dividing by 0.

Step 2 is not clear. Also, I think you need to say something about a and b being relatively prime. The same for m and n.

There is an issue just before step 4. You don't give the information, you just said you solved for ##x##. But then, how do you know:

##x^2 = 2 \frac{y^2 m^2}{n^2}##

is even? An integer times 2 is even... but here you have a rational number times 2.

I do think you can work from this information, but you have to do something different algebraically.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K