I N-body simulation of high or low-mass dark matter particles

AI Thread Summary
N-body simulations reveal significant challenges in distinguishing the distribution and dynamics of dark matter based on particle mass due to current resolution limits, which are around 10^4 to 10^5 solar masses. This resolution is insufficient to accurately resolve the mass of dark matter particles, which are theorized to be much lighter. While computational limits exist, improvements are unlikely to bridge the vast gap between simulation particle masses and the expected mass of dark matter. Studies like Lovell (2020) and Yepes (2013) explore different dark matter models, including Warm and Cold Dark Matter, but the effectiveness of these simulations is constrained by their resolution. Overall, the ability to discern differences in dark matter behavior based on mass remains limited by current simulation capabilities.
Ranku
Messages
433
Reaction score
18
Do we notice any significant difference in distribution and dynamics of dark matter in galaxies when n-body simulations are done with high or low-mass dark matter particles?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What do you mean by high or low mass? If you are thinking of resolving the mass of the DM particles this way, you need to know that the resolution of the simulations is nowhere near the level of being able to do this. I think the highest resolution n-body simulations have particle masses on the order of 10^4 to 10^5 Msun.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
phyzguy said:
What do you mean by high or low mass? If you are thinking of resolving the mass of the DM particles this way, you need to know that the resolution of the simulations is nowhere near the level of being able to do this. I think the highest resolution n-body simulations have particle masses on the order of 10^4 to 10^5 Msun.
I didn't know that the mass resolution is that low. Is it a computational limit, and therefore can improve?
 
Yes it is a computational limit. But 10^5 Msun is at least 50 orders of magnitude greater than a presumed DM particle, so don't hold you breath. Unless of course DM is primordial black holes...
 
Lovell (2020) employs the EAGLE simulation to compare Warm Dark Matter (i.e. keV scale particles), Cold Dark Matter (i.e. GeV scale particles) and Self-Interacting Dark Matter models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.11129v1

The CLUE simulation compares WDM and CDM models in Yepes (2013). https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.0105

A survey of WDM to CDM comparisons by multiple means can be found in de Vega (2011). https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.3187

Axion-like Dark Matter (i.e. ultralight) and Cold Dark Matter models are compared in Marsh (2015) although most not by simulation methods. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.07633
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top