N-body simulation of high or low-mass dark matter particles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

N-body simulations reveal significant limitations in resolving the mass of dark matter (DM) particles, with the highest resolution currently at approximately 10^4 to 10^5 Msun. This mass resolution is a computational constraint, making it impossible to accurately distinguish between high and low-mass DM particles. Key studies, including Lovell (2020) utilizing the EAGLE simulation, and Yepes (2013) with the CLUE simulation, provide comparative analyses of Warm Dark Matter (WDM) and Cold Dark Matter (CDM) models. Further insights can be found in de Vega (2011) and Marsh (2015), which explore various dark matter models.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of N-body simulations and their limitations
  • Familiarity with dark matter particle classifications: Warm Dark Matter (WDM) and Cold Dark Matter (CDM)
  • Knowledge of computational constraints in astrophysical simulations
  • Awareness of key studies in dark matter research, such as EAGLE and CLUE simulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the EAGLE simulation methodology and findings
  • Explore the CLUE simulation and its implications for dark matter models
  • Study the differences between Warm Dark Matter and Cold Dark Matter in detail
  • Investigate the role of primordial black holes in dark matter theories
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and researchers focusing on dark matter dynamics and simulation methodologies will benefit from this discussion.

Ranku
Messages
434
Reaction score
18
Do we notice any significant difference in distribution and dynamics of dark matter in galaxies when n-body simulations are done with high or low-mass dark matter particles?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What do you mean by high or low mass? If you are thinking of resolving the mass of the DM particles this way, you need to know that the resolution of the simulations is nowhere near the level of being able to do this. I think the highest resolution n-body simulations have particle masses on the order of 10^4 to 10^5 Msun.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
phyzguy said:
What do you mean by high or low mass? If you are thinking of resolving the mass of the DM particles this way, you need to know that the resolution of the simulations is nowhere near the level of being able to do this. I think the highest resolution n-body simulations have particle masses on the order of 10^4 to 10^5 Msun.
I didn't know that the mass resolution is that low. Is it a computational limit, and therefore can improve?
 
Yes it is a computational limit. But 10^5 Msun is at least 50 orders of magnitude greater than a presumed DM particle, so don't hold you breath. Unless of course DM is primordial black holes...
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Ranku
Lovell (2020) employs the EAGLE simulation to compare Warm Dark Matter (i.e. keV scale particles), Cold Dark Matter (i.e. GeV scale particles) and Self-Interacting Dark Matter models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.11129v1

The CLUE simulation compares WDM and CDM models in Yepes (2013). https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.0105

A survey of WDM to CDM comparisons by multiple means can be found in de Vega (2011). https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.3187

Axion-like Dark Matter (i.e. ultralight) and Cold Dark Matter models are compared in Marsh (2015) although most not by simulation methods. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.07633
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Ranku

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
765
Replies
1
Views
2K