Naked singularity can actually move the spacecraft in past?

AI Thread Summary
Naked singularities are theorized to be points where the laws of physics break down, potentially allowing for time travel by enabling spacecraft to move into the past. The discussion highlights the possibility of using the energy from a naked singularity to alter a spacecraft's trajectory outside the conventional space-time cone. However, the complexity of the physics involved makes it difficult to provide clear answers without extensive mathematical explanations. The conversation also notes that the forum's focus on homework help may limit responses from knowledgeable physicists. Ultimately, the topic remains speculative and requires further exploration within the scientific community.
Huma waseem
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Naked singularity can actually move the spacecraft in past?

A singularity is a place where the laws of physics break down. So if singularities can interact with the outside Universe, then anything is possible. For instance, it would be possible to send a spacecraft round such a naked singularity on a trajectory that takes it into the past, achieving genuine time travel.
the text in bold ... can u explain me?
Singularity if not so hidden so can become the strong and extraordinary source of energy... so it is possible that matter will through with great intensity if near to the Naked singularity so by the above sentence in bold what may i understand that it is possible that this ebergy source will move my spacecraft not actually in forward direction of the cone of space time?so it is possible to go in PAST anyway? ... my threads are not answered basically that's why i am explaining briefly what my problem is...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Huma waseem said:
A singularity is a place where the laws of physics break down. So if singularities can interact with the outside Universe, then anything is possible. For instance, it would be possible to send a spacecraft round such a naked singularity on a trajectory that takes it into the past, achieving genuine time travel.
the text in bold ... can u explain me?
Singularity if not so hidden so can become the strong and extraordinary source of energy... so it is possible that matter will through with great intensity if near to the Naked singularity so by the above sentence in bold what may i understand that it is possible that this ebergy source will move my spacecraft not actually in forward direction of the cone of space time?so it is possible to go in PAST anyway? ... my threads are not answered basically that's why i am explaining briefly what my problem is...

There are a number of reasons nobody is answering your posts. You've posted this in the homework help forum for a start. Secondly, you've conceeded yourself that in a singularity the laws of physics no longer apply. This is a physics forum, and even if anyone genuinely understood the answer it would probably take 13 pages of maths you don't know to explain it. If any enlightening facts about time travel arise through this 'theory', trust me that you'll hear about them on the national news.
 
Flux = Rad said:
There are a number of reasons nobody is answering your posts. You've posted this in the homework help forum for a start. Secondly, you've conceeded yourself that in a singularity the laws of physics no longer apply. This is a physics forum, and even if anyone genuinely understood the answer it would probably take 13 pages of maths you don't know to explain it. If any enlightening facts about time travel arise through this 'theory', trust me that you'll hear about them on the national news.

Sir the singularity is basically the point where there is the infinite density and yet in the case of naked singularity no one can predict what will come out from it so physics may loose its prediction power but it is still a physics phenomena i didn t need any mathematics to prove it but here i think so many physicist are here who can atleast confirm me that could it is possible to with the naked singularity that to go in the past ... the above qouted line in BOLD LETTER is taken from the website url with newscientist.com ... i just want the views of all of you about this statement and with what angle you people look at it ...
 
Last edited:
helloooooooooooo ! please take attension homework helppers :confused: :shy:
 
sorry , but i think you must be patient because all the homework helpers are helping others too. Please just wait and do your other homework questions.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top