MHB Name102's question at Yahoo Answers regarding displacement vs. distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Displacement
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

The velocity function (in meters per second) for a particle moving along a line is v(t)=2t−8?

Over the time interval 0≤t≤10.

1)Find the displacement of the particle over the time interval.

2) Find the total distance traveled by the particle over the time interval.

Here is a link to the question:

The velocity function (in meters per second) for a particle moving along a line is v(t)=2t−8? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Name102,

First, let's look at a graphical method, involving simple geometry, which we can use to answer the questions. Let's graph the linear velocity function, and take the magnitude of the area between the $x$-axis and the velocity function as distance, and applying the sign for displacement.

The area below is shaded in red and the area above is shaded in green:

i35o3a.jpg


Now to find the displacement we subtract the red area from the green and for the distance we add the two areas. This is easy to find since they are both right triangles.

The red area is:

[math]A_R=\frac{1}{2}\cdot4\cdot8=16[/math]

The green area is:

[math]A_G=\frac{1}{2}\cdot6\cdot12=36[/math]

1.) The displacement of the particle is then [math]A_G-A_R=36-16=20[/math]

2.) The total distance traveled is then [math]A_G+A_R=36+16=52[/math]

However, only in cases of constant acceleration will it be this simple, so let's examine how we may do this by applying the calculus.

We may orient our coordinate axis such that the initial position of the particle coincides with the origin.

For displacement, we have the IVP:

[math]\frac{dx}{dt}=2t-8[/math] where [math]x(0)=0[/math]

Integrating with respect to $t$, we obtain:

[math]\int\,dx=\int 2t-8\,dt[/math]

[math]x(t)=t^2-8t+C[/math]

Using the initial values, we may determine the value of the parameter $C$:

[math]x(0)=0^2-8(0)+C=0\,\therefore\,C=0[/math]

and so the solution satisfying the IVP is:

[math]x(t)=t^2-8t[/math]

Now, the displacement is the final position minus the initial position:

[math]x(10)-x(0)=20-0=20[/math]

For total distance, we have the IVP:

[math]\frac{dx}{dt}=|2t-8|[/math] where [math]x(0)=0[/math]

Here, we may treat the function as piecewise and use two integrals:

[math]\int\,dx=\int_0^4 8-2t\,dt+\int_4^{10}2t-8\,dt[/math]

[math]x=\left[8t-t^2 \right]_0^4+\left[t^2-8t \right]_4^{10}=(16-0)+(20-(-16))=52[/math]

To Name102 and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other calculus questions here in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top