Napier's Constant Limit Definition

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the limit definition of Napier's constant, e, specifically the expression \(\lim_{x\to \infty}(1+ 1/x)^x\). It is established that while \(1/x\) approaches 0 as \(x\) approaches infinity, the expression converges to e rather than being undefined as \(1^\infty\). The proof hinges on the definition of e through the derivative of the function \(f(x)=a^x\) and the limit \(\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^h- 1}{h}= 1\), which leads to the conclusion that \(a\) can be approximated by \((1+ h)^{1/h}\) as \(h\) approaches 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their derivatives
  • Knowledge of the definition and properties of Napier's constant, e
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal definition of the exponential function and its derivatives
  • Learn about the properties of limits, particularly indeterminate forms like \(1^\infty\)
  • Explore rigorous proofs of the limit \(\lim_{x\to \infty}(1+ 1/x)^x= e\)
  • Investigate alternative definitions of e and their implications in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, educators, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of limits and exponential functions.

scorsesse
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all ! I am terribly sorry if this was answered before but i couldn't find the post. So that's the deal. We all know that while x→∞ (1+1/x)^x → e

But I am deeply telling myself that 1/x goes to 0 while x goes to infinity. 1+0 = 1 and we have 1^∞ which is undefined. But also see that 1/x +1 is not a continuous function so i cannot simply take the limit of it and raise the value to x like : (limit of 1/x + 1)^x while x→∞

So can you please give me a rigorous proof for why this function approaches to Napier's constant ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot first take the limit of 1+ 1/x as x goes to infinity and then say that you are taking [itex]1^\infty[/itex]. The limits must be taken simultaneously.

How you show that [itex]\lim_{x\to \infty}(1+ 1/x)^x= e[/itex] depends upon exactly how you define e itself. In some texts, e is defined as that limit, after you have proved that the limit does, in fact, exist.

But you can also prove, without reference to e, that the derivative of the function [itex]f(x)=a^x[/itex] is a constant (depending on a) time [itex]a^x[/itex]. And then define e to be such that that constant is 1.

That is, if [itex]f(x)= a^x[/itex] then [itex]f(x+h)= a^{x+h}= a^xa^h[/itex] so that
[tex]\frac{a^{x+h}- a^x}{h}= \frac{a^xa^h- a^x}{h}= a^x\frac{a^h- 1}{h}[/tex]
so that
[tex]\frac{da^x}{dx}= a^x \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^h- 1}{h}[/tex]
and e is defined to be the number such that
[tex]\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^h- 1}{h}= 1[/tex].

That means that, for h sufficiently close to 0, we can write
[tex]\frac{a^h- 1}{h}[/tex]
is approximately 1 so that
[tex]a^h- 1[/tex]
is approximately equal to h and then [itex]a^h[/itex] is approximately equal to 1+ h.
That, in turn, means that a is approximately equal to [itex](1+ h)^{1/h}[/itex]

Now, let x= 1/h so that becomes [itex](1+ 1/x)^x[/itex] and as h goes to 0, h goes to infinity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K