MHB Nathan Curtis' Question at Yahoo Answers regarding Differential Equations

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a differential equation where the function f satisfies f(1) = 2. It is determined that f'(1) equals 5, derived from the equation f'(x) = (f(x))^2 + x^2. Further differentiation leads to f''(1) being calculated as 22, and f'''(1) as 140. The calculations clarify the relationships between the derivatives and the function values at x = 1. The response provides valuable insights for understanding differential equations, particularly for those struggling with the subject.
Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Nathan Curtis said:
Let I be an open interval containing 1 and f : I → R be a function such that f(1) = 2. Assume f is a solution of the differential equation y′ − y^2=x^2 . Find f'(1) f''(1) and f'''(1).

Here is a link to the question:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130903134631AAuRmGn

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Nathan Curtis,

In this problem, we're assuming that $y=f(x)$ is a solution to the differential equation $y^{\prime}-y^2 = x^2$. Thus, in terms of $f(x)$, this means that
\[f^{\prime}(x) - (f(x))^2 = x^2 \implies f^{\prime}(x) = (f(x))^2 + x^2.\]
Since we know that $f(1)=2$, we now see that
\[f^{\prime}(1) = (f(1))^2 + (1)^2 = 2^2+1^2 = 5.\]
Differentiating the expression for $f^{\prime}(x)$ yields the equation
\[f^{\prime\prime}(x) = 2 f(x)\cdot f^{\prime}(x) + 2x\]
and thus
\[f^{\prime\prime}(1) = 2 f(1)\cdot f^{\prime}(1) + 2(1) = 2(2)(5) + 2 = 22.\]
Differentiating the expression for $f^{\prime\prime}(x)$ yields the equation
\[f^{\prime\prime\prime}(x) = 2 (f^{\prime}(x))^2 + 2 f(x)\cdot f^{\prime\prime}(x) + 2\]
and thus
\[f^{\prime\prime\prime}(1) = 2 (f^{\prime}(1))^2 + 2 f(1)\cdot f^{\prime\prime}(1) + 2 = 2(5)^2+2(2)(22) + 2 = 140\]

Therefore, if $f(1)=2$, then $f^{\prime}(1)=5$, $f^{\prime\prime}(1) = 22$ and $f^{\prime\prime\prime}(1) = 140$.

I hope this makes sense!
 
Thank you so much for the help and linking me to this website! I'm sure I will be using it a lot this semester because I can hardly understand my professor in diff eq. This helped a lot though and made me realize where I made my original mistake. Again thanks so much!
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K