National laboratories vs academia

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Academia
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison between pursuing a career in national laboratories versus academia for individuals with a PhD in physics. Participants explore the competitiveness of job opportunities, the nature of work in national labs, and the types of positions available outside of traditional academic roles.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that while there are many discouragements regarding grad school due to the oversupply of grad students compared to faculty positions, national laboratories may offer a more accessible alternative for PhD holders.
  • Others argue that jobs in national laboratories are at least as competitive as faculty positions, highlighting the advantages of full-time research opportunities, better infrastructure, and potentially higher pay.
  • There is a suggestion that many jobs for physics PhDs exist outside of academia, not limited to quantitative banking, with some participants asking for examples of such roles.
  • One participant provides links to job postings in high-tech Fortune 500 companies, indicating that these positions are relevant for physics graduates and may offer similar opportunities to those found in national labs.
  • A later reply discusses the structure of employment in national labs, distinguishing between civil servant and contractor positions, with civil servant roles being likened to academic appointments and noted as difficult to obtain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the accessibility and competitiveness of positions in national laboratories compared to academia. There is no consensus on whether national labs provide a significantly easier pathway for PhD holders than academic positions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying perspectives on job market dynamics for physics PhDs, with assumptions about job availability and competitiveness that may not be universally applicable. Specific examples and links to job postings are provided, but the relevance and applicability of these examples may vary by individual circumstances.

Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
Many people often discourage people from going into grad school since there are far more grad students than faculty openings.

But what about national laboratories? Is it much easier for someone with a PhD to enter a national laboratory than it is for someone to successfully get a position in academia? How does a position in a national laboratory compare to a postdoc position?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are not discouraging people from going to grad school, they are discouraging people who have this professorship or die attitude. There are many jobs for physics PhD's that don't involve academia. And no, they are not all in quantitative banking.
 
NL staff jobs are at least as competitive as faculty jobs. You have the ability to work on research full-time, you have better infrastructure than at most universities, and the pay is supposedly better. This makes for a very attractive package.
 
Phyisab**** said:
They are not discouraging people from going to grad school, they are discouraging people who have this professorship or die attitude. There are many jobs for physics PhD's that don't involve academia. And no, they are not all in quantitative banking.

What are they?
 
capandbells said:
What are they?

They run the range of physics which is applicable to commercial applications. Look up any high tech Fortune 500 company and browse the available jobs. For example (I found these in 5 minutes):

https://jobs3.netmedia1.com/cp/job_...obmail=null&isd=0&lnl=0&adv=0&t=1292549146589

https://jobs3.netmedia1.com/cp/job_...obmail=null&isd=0&lnl=0&adv=0&t=1292549459603

https://jobs3.netmedia1.com/cp/job_...obmail=null&isd=0&lnl=0&adv=0&t=1292549743679The company I did an internship with last summer (which I will not name for anonymity but is also a high tech Fortune 500 company) has similar opportunities. I worked with a number of PhD physicists.Edit: Here's another one which looks extremely interesting.
https://jobs3.netmedia1.com/cp/job_...obmail=null&isd=0&lnl=0&adv=0&t=1292550291879
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/states/state.html

Here is a very nice website. This data is for physics bachelor's, but if you look at the companies listed, most of them also hire PhD's.
 
Simfish said:
Many people often discourage people from going into grad school since there are far more grad students than faculty openings.

But what about national laboratories? Is it much easier for someone with a PhD to enter a national laboratory than it is for someone to successfully get a position in academia? How does a position in a national laboratory compare to a postdoc position?

Zz can tell you a lot more, but in my experience, there are (essentially) two tiers of employees in national labs: civil servants and contractors. I've worked for a contractor, and it's basically like getting a job. Civil servant positions are similar in spirit to academic appointments, and very difficult to obtain.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K