MHB Natural Solutions for Positive Variables?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hatuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Natural
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether a solution exists in natural numbers for a finite set of positive variables given a non-strict order on their expressions. It begins by analyzing equalities, noting that they define a subspace in real numbers with a basis of rational vectors. The thread emphasizes that rational points are dense in this subspace, allowing for approximations. It also highlights that strict inequalities and positivity conditions create an open subset containing a specific point. Ultimately, it concludes that by adjusting a rational point, an integer solution can be derived.
Hatuk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
Consider a finite set of positive variables $P = \{x_1,x_2,\ldots, x_n \}$, and a non-strict order on the expressions $\Sigma_{x_i \subseteq P}x_i$. For example:
$$P = \{x_1,x_2,x_3\}$$
$$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 > x_1 + x_2 > x_2 + x_3 > x_1 = x_2 > x_3$$
Can we claim that if there is a solution in which $\forall i,x_i \in \mathbb{R}^+$, there must be a solution in which $\forall i, x_i \in \mathbb{N}^+$?
Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You need to consider the equalities and the strict inequalities separately.

Start with the equalities. If there are $d$ of them, they will define an $(n-d)$-dimensional subspace $S$ of $\Bbb{R}^n$, which will have a basis $\{\mathbf{e}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{e}_{n-d}\}$ consisting of rational vectors (vectors with rational coordinates). [In your example, there is just one equality, $x_1 = x_2$. That defines a two-dimensional subspace of $\Bbb{R}^3$, with a basis $\{\mathbf{e}_1=(1,1,0),\mathbf{e}_2=(0,0,1)\}$.]

Every point in $S$ is of the form $\alpha_1\mathbf{e}_1 + \ldots + \alpha_{n-d}\mathbf{e}_{n-d}$, where $\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_{n-d}$ are real coefficients. By approximating these coefficients with rational numbers, you see that the rational points in $S$ are dense in $S$.

The strict inequalities in your set, together with the inequalities $x_i>0\ (1\leqslant i\leqslant n)$, define an open subset of $S$. You are told that this subset contains a point $\mathbf{x} = (x_1,\ldots,x_n)$. So by taking a rational point $\mathbf{r}$ in $S$ sufficiently close to $\mathbf{x}$, you can find a rational solution to the problem.

Finally, by multiplying $\mathbf{r}$ by the least common multiple of the denominators of all its coordinates, you get an integer solution to the problem.
 
Thanks!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top