Natural Solutions for Positive Variables?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hatuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Natural
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between solutions of positive variables in real numbers and integers. It establishes that if a solution exists for a finite set of positive variables $P = \{x_1,x_2,\ldots, x_n\}$ in $\mathbb{R}^+$, then a corresponding solution also exists in $\mathbb{N}^+$. The reasoning involves defining an $(n-d)$-dimensional subspace $S$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$ based on equalities, demonstrating the density of rational points in $S$, and utilizing strict inequalities to find a rational solution that can be converted into an integer solution through multiplication by the least common multiple of the denominators.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite sets and positive variables in mathematical contexts.
  • Familiarity with concepts of subspaces and dimensionality in linear algebra.
  • Knowledge of rational and integer number systems.
  • Basic principles of inequalities and their implications in mathematical proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of $(n-d)$-dimensional subspaces in linear algebra.
  • Explore the density of rational points in real number spaces.
  • Learn about the least common multiple and its applications in number theory.
  • Investigate the implications of strict inequalities in mathematical proofs and solutions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of positive variables and their solutions in real and integer domains.

Hatuk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
Consider a finite set of positive variables $P = \{x_1,x_2,\ldots, x_n \}$, and a non-strict order on the expressions $\Sigma_{x_i \subseteq P}x_i$. For example:
$$P = \{x_1,x_2,x_3\}$$
$$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 > x_1 + x_2 > x_2 + x_3 > x_1 = x_2 > x_3$$
Can we claim that if there is a solution in which $\forall i,x_i \in \mathbb{R}^+$, there must be a solution in which $\forall i, x_i \in \mathbb{N}^+$?
Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You need to consider the equalities and the strict inequalities separately.

Start with the equalities. If there are $d$ of them, they will define an $(n-d)$-dimensional subspace $S$ of $\Bbb{R}^n$, which will have a basis $\{\mathbf{e}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{e}_{n-d}\}$ consisting of rational vectors (vectors with rational coordinates). [In your example, there is just one equality, $x_1 = x_2$. That defines a two-dimensional subspace of $\Bbb{R}^3$, with a basis $\{\mathbf{e}_1=(1,1,0),\mathbf{e}_2=(0,0,1)\}$.]

Every point in $S$ is of the form $\alpha_1\mathbf{e}_1 + \ldots + \alpha_{n-d}\mathbf{e}_{n-d}$, where $\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_{n-d}$ are real coefficients. By approximating these coefficients with rational numbers, you see that the rational points in $S$ are dense in $S$.

The strict inequalities in your set, together with the inequalities $x_i>0\ (1\leqslant i\leqslant n)$, define an open subset of $S$. You are told that this subset contains a point $\mathbf{x} = (x_1,\ldots,x_n)$. So by taking a rational point $\mathbf{r}$ in $S$ sufficiently close to $\mathbf{x}$, you can find a rational solution to the problem.

Finally, by multiplying $\mathbf{r}$ by the least common multiple of the denominators of all its coordinates, you get an integer solution to the problem.
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K