Nebular Theory: Understanding Flattening Process

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Trinitiet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Process
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nebular theory, specifically focusing on the flattening process of gas clouds during solar system formation. Participants seek to understand the physical and mathematical explanations behind this phenomenon, exploring the roles of friction, gravity, and angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire for a qualitative explanation of the flattening process in nebular theory, indicating a physical intuition that it should occur.
  • Another participant suggests that friction plays a key role in averaging out angular momentum among particles, leading them to align within the plane of rotation.
  • A question is raised about the role of gravity in the flattening process, with a response indicating that while gravity has an impact, it is not the main reason for the flattening.
  • It is proposed that friction, along with thermal emission of photons, causes particles to move into lower orbits over time.
  • A participant questions whether friction only reduces the speed of particles rather than aligning them into a common plane, prompting a clarification that friction also changes the direction of particles through random interactions.
  • It is noted that particles in a common plane experience less friction, which affects their movement towards the center of the gravitational potential well.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the primary mechanism driving the flattening process, with differing views on the roles of friction and gravity. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact contributions of these forces.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of friction and its effects on particle motion, as well as the interplay between gravity and electromagnetic phenomena. There are unresolved aspects regarding the mathematical modeling of these interactions.

Trinitiet
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I try to understand the nebular theory (how the solar systems are formed) but I keep having problems with the flattening.

My physical intuition "feels" the flattening process should happen, but I want a physical/mathematical qualitative explanation.

What is the key physical law that makes the flattening happen?

Thanks!

Trinitiet.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Trinitiet said:
Hi,

I try to understand the nebular theory (how the solar systems are formed) but I keep having problems with the flattening.

My physical intuition "feels" the flattening process should happen, but I want a physical/mathematical qualitative explanation.

What is the key physical law that makes the flattening happen?

Thanks!

Trinitiet.
It's basically just friction.

Consider that simply by random chance, the cloud of gas will have some net angular momentum. Friction sort of averages out this angular momentum between the particles, and any particles with orbit not in the plane of rotation quickly, through friction, move to orbits within the plane of rotation.
 
Chalnoth said:
It's basically just friction.

Consider that simply by random chance, the cloud of gas will have some net angular momentum. Friction sort of averages out this angular momentum between the particles, and any particles with orbit not in the plane of rotation quickly, through friction, move to orbits within the plane of rotation.

Thanks :-)
Is gravity the force that leads it there to?
 
Trinitiet said:
Thanks :-)
Is gravity the force that leads it there to?
Well, gravity has an impact, but isn't the main reason. Once the cloud is self-gravitating, with all of its particles in mutual orbits around one another, the reason why those particles go into lower orbits over time is due to this friction (as well as simple thermal emission of photons), which is primarily an electromagnetic phenomenon.
 
Chalnoth said:
Well, gravity has an impact, but isn't the main reason. Once the cloud is self-gravitating, with all of its particles in mutual orbits around one another, the reason why those particles go into lower orbits over time is due to this friction (as well as simple thermal emission of photons), which is primarily an electromagnetic phenomenon.

As friction takes place, only in the direction the particle moves, wouldn't then friction only make the particle rotate slower (thus making each rotating circle of particles smaller), rather than moving the particles to one common plane?
 
Trinitiet said:
As friction takes place, only in the direction the particle moves, wouldn't then friction only make the particle rotate slower (thus making each rotating circle of particles smaller), rather than moving the particles to one common plane?
In a microscopic view, the friction is a result of random interactions such as atom-atom collisions. So no, the friction doesn't just make them slower, it tends to change their direction randomly. Such collisions, however, tend to release some of their energy in the form of radiation, which means that there is less energy in the system, which means they are forced to take lower orbits.

But those particles that manage to find themselves in a common plane of rotation experience less friction, and so fall to the center of the gravitational potential well more slowly.
 
Chalnoth said:
In a microscopic view, the friction is a result of random interactions such as atom-atom collisions. So no, the friction doesn't just make them slower, it tends to change their direction randomly. But those particles that manage to find themselves in a common plane of rotation experience less friction, and so fall to the center of the gravitational potential well more slowly.

Ah thanks :-) !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
626
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K