Need help learning to construct proofs

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs
Click For Summary
Constructing proofs is a significant focus in upper-level math courses, particularly in Theory of Linear Algebra, where understanding theorems is essential. To start writing proofs, it's important to familiarize oneself with theorems and definitions, as they provide a foundation for constructing arguments. Resources like "Problem Solving" by C. Larson can be helpful, as they outline methods for approaching proofs, including looking for counterexamples and using induction. A practical approach involves rearranging problems by applying learned theorems step-by-step. With practice, one can streamline the proof process by relying on familiar techniques and theorems.
quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
so, I am in my first upper level math course beyond required calculus and the introductory linear algebra class. I don't know if it's just a great jump or if I slept through something, but suddenly everything is all about doing proofs. I'm okay with that, and I think it's fabulous because proofs seem to yield deeper conceptual understanding, but I have no experience whatsoever with writing/constructing proofs. I can memorize axioms and whatnot, but then how do I get started? anyone have any good texts on proof writing or know of any resources that could help me? I'm clueless here!

I don't know if it makes a difference (with regards to what kind of proof I should study) but the class is Theory of Linear Algebra. I love the topic, just have no idea how to prove things for every case... :blushing:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yes there is a good book called Problem Solving by "C" Larson. Not sure if the C is the write letter.

the main way that I learned how to do proofs was to cram allt he theorems on one page. granted that you actually have to understand these theorems.

The straight forward method is to just rearrange your problem by regurgitating each step via one the theorems that you have learned up till that point.

Larson's Book outlines steps you should take to rearranging a given problem in such as looking for a counterexample(contradiction), recursion(can't remember the proper term...oh induction), look for symmetry and parity.

At the beginning of it all though try to define your problem based on all the previous defintions that you have learned.

...onc eyou become more accustomed to knowing some theorems and techniques then you can skip the majority of steps.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
777
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
665
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K