Need help on how to find the Equivalence Ratio of combustion for plastic waste

  • Thread starter Thread starter rhmourwa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Equivalence Ratio (ER) for combustion in a gasification experiment using plastic waste as feedstock. Participants explore methods to determine the stoichiometric Air-Fuel ratio, particularly in the context of incomplete data regarding the chemical composition of the plastic waste.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about calculating the Equivalence Ratio due to the lack of a precise chemical formula for the plastic waste and questions whether ultimate analysis can be used for this purpose.
  • Another participant confirms that ultimate analysis can be used but notes that the total composition does not sum to 100%, prompting questions about the volatile matter (VM) and its implications for dry fuel content.
  • A participant suggests creating a hypothetical hydrocarbon based on known carbon and hydrogen percentages to evaluate the oxygen required for combustion, while also questioning the nature of the ash content.
  • One participant presents a combustion reaction derived from their analysis and calculates the theoretical oxygen required, adjusting for the oxygen present in the fuel, and seeks confirmation of their calculations.
  • Another participant requests a diagram to clarify the mass flow analysis process and suggests using a spreadsheet to account for various burning processes and to compute oxygen demand.
  • There is mention of a rule of thumb regarding the air required for burning hydrocarbons, which is proposed as a sanity check for calculations.
  • Participants discuss the practical aspects of adjusting air mass flow rates to achieve an ER of 1 for complete combustion, referencing a specific equation for this purpose.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexities of real combustion processes, including the role of oxygen sensors and the importance of exhaust gas analysis in managing combustion efficiency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the use of ultimate analysis for calculating the stoichiometric Air-Fuel ratio, but there are differing views on the implications of the data and the methods for calculating the Equivalence Ratio. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing approaches and calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the incomplete chemical composition of the plastic waste, the potential for double counting in mass flow analysis, and the need for further clarification on the role of volatile matter in combustion.

rhmourwa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
How to find the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio and equivalence ratio of combustion (Plastic waste + Air) in the gasification of plastic waste
Hello
Actually, I'd like to find the effect of different Equivalence Ratios on my gasification experiment using plastic waste as feedstock fuel but I'm confused as to how I can find the Equivalence Ratio because I don't know the exact chemical formula of plastic waste I'm using. So I'm curious how can I calculate the stoichiometric Air-Fuel ratio of combustion? Can I use the ultimate analysis to calculate the stoichiometric Air-Fuel ratio?

This is the analysis of my feedstock (%w/w),
Moisture =10%
Ash =0.09%
VM =89.7%
FC =0.21%
C =83.1%
H =11.77%
O =4.83%
N =0.14%
S = 0.16%

I specify waste mass flowrate = 20 kg/h,
air mass flowrate = 10 kg/h
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
rhmourwa said:
Can I use the ultimate analysis to calculate the stoichiometric Air-Fuel ratio?
Yes, you can, but the total is not 100%.
What is the VM =89.7%, is that volatiles such as water ?
Does that mean the remainder is the dry fuel = 10.3% ?

If you know the carbon and the hydrogen, then you can make up a hypothetical hydrocarbon and evaluate the oxygen required for its combustion.
Some of the O =4.83% may be available.
Is the ash a silicate?
 
Baluncore said:
Yes, you can, but the total is not 100%.
What is the VM =89.7%, is that volatiles such as water ?
Does that mean the remainder is the dry fuel = 10.3% ?

If you know the carbon and the hydrogen, then you can make up a hypothetical hydrocarbon and evaluate the oxygen required for its combustion.
Some of the O =4.83% may be available.
Is the ash a silicate?
Thank you for answering. Yes, the VM means volatile matter and VM=89.7% is the weight percent of nonwater gas that is released when this plastic waste is heated in the absence of air.

So according to this reference website (this), Is this the same combustion reaction you mean? and to make up a hypothetical hydrocarbon, I change %mass basis in analysis to moles basis, and the combustion reaction will be:
C0.069H0.117 + 0.0465(O2 + 3.76N2) → 0.069CO2 + 0.0585H2O + 0.1748N2

From my understanding, this means oxygen required theoretically for combustion is 0.0465 mole but there is also 4.83%weight oxygen (=0.003 mole) in fuel. So, the amount of oxygen required is actually 0.0465-0.003 = 0.0435 mole and the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio will be = 0.0435+(0.0465*3.76) = 0.2183 mole. Am I doing it correctly? if you can correct me step by step, I'm very thankful.

and I have another question. If I want to change my actual air mass flow rate to achieve ER=1 for complete combustion. Can I determine it by using this equation:
air mass flow rate actual= Equivalence ratio * mass flowrate of fuel used * stoichiometric air-fuel ratio
 
rhmourwa said:
Am I doing it correctly? if you can correct me step by step, I'm very thankful.
I need a diagram that shows the mass flow through the analysis process. That way, I can see where the double counting is being done. For example, are the VM gasses being burnt? What do they include?

Following on from that diagram, I would use a spreadsheet to account for the many burning processes, to produce the mixed exhaust gas stream. The oxygen demand needed for that process can be computed in the spreadsheet.

There is a simple rule of thumb that says, for each one pound of hydrocarbon fuel burnt, about 14.5 pounds of air are required. That will give you a sanity check of your spreadsheet.

rhmourwa said:
... and I have another question. If I want to change my actual air mass flow rate to achieve ER=1 for complete combustion. Can I determine it by using this equation:
air mass flow rate actual= Equivalence ratio * mass flowrate of fuel used * stoichiometric air-fuel ratio
When it comes to burning a waste stream in a real furnace, there will be oxygen sensors in the exhaust, adjusting the air supply and secondary burning, or catalytic conversion of flue gasses. The precise computation of the stoichiometry will become moot, to be replaced by analysis of the bag house filtering to remove pollutants. The spreadsheet can help estimate the quantities and size of the exhaust gas processing plant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
31K