I Need Help on Particle Spin

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
357
Reaction score
33
TL;DR Summary
Why do particles spin all the time?
All elementary particles have an intrinsic spin/angular momentum. The fact that particles spin at all is due to Special Relativity. How MUCH they spin, half-integer multiples of reduced Planck's Constant, is due to Quantum Mechanics. Right?

Apparently, the reason particles spin at all is because two non-colinear Lorentz Boosts are the same as one Lorentz Boost followed by a rotation. How do you go from that to all particles spin all the time?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LarryS said:
All elementary particles have an intrinsic spin/angular momentum.
Except those that don't, such as the Higgs. Unless you're counting spin zero as having "intrinsic spin/angular momentum".

LarryS said:
The fact that particles spin at all is due to Special Relativity.
Why do you think this?

LarryS said:
How MUCH they spin, half-integer multiples of reduced Planck's Constant, is due to Quantum Mechanics. Right?
There is a spin-statistics connection which is believed to be due to quantum field theory, that particles with integer spin are bosons and particles with half-integer spin are fermions.

LarryS said:
Apparently, the reason particles spin at all is because two non-colinear Lorentz Boosts are the same as one Lorentz Boost followed by a rotation.
Where are you getting this from? Do you have a reference?
 
LarryS said:
TL;DR Summary: Why do particles spin all the time?

All elementary particles have an intrinsic spin/angular momentum. The fact that particles spin at all is due to Special Relativity.
In addition to #2:
Elementary particles don't spin. Many of them have non-classical degrees of freedom which are named "spin", because their quantum behavior under application of Lorentz transformations (especially spatial rotations) resembles that of angular momentum. The polarizations of light are a well known example of spin. They readily appear in the classical treatment when we regard light as EM waves. You know that a linear polarization of an EM plan-wave in vacuum doesn't "spin", right?

LarryS said:
Apparently, the reason particles spin at all is because two non-colinear Lorentz Boosts are the same as one Lorentz Boost followed by a rotation.
Could it be that you are confused between spin and Thomas Precession?
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and PeroK
LarryS said:
How do you go from that to all particles spin all the time?
This question looks like if you were asking for why are particles spinning, do not confuse spin (intrinsic quantum property) with spatial rotation, particles cannot rotate.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top