Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around issues related to figure submission for a paper to the Journal of Applied Physics, specifically addressing the problem of figures being rotated incorrectly when converted to PDF format. The scope includes technical aspects of file conversion and submission requirements.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses concern about figures being rotated by 90 degrees in the PDF conversion and seeks immediate assistance on whether this needs to be fixed and how to do so.
- Another participant humorously suggests rotating the figure another 270 degrees as a potential solution.
- A different participant questions the necessity of converting figures to PDF, asking if the conversion was for visual verification or part of compiling the LaTeX document for the journal's template.
- This participant also notes that if the figures appear correct in PS or EPS formats, that is what matters to the journal editors.
- Further advice is provided regarding the use of Ghostscript and Gimp for file conversion, including the possibility of rotating and resaving figures using these tools.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants have differing views on the necessity of fixing the rotation issue, with some suggesting it may not be critical if the figures are correct in other formats. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to handle the figure orientation problem.
Contextual Notes
There are limitations regarding the assumptions about the journal's requirements for figure formats and the specific software capabilities mentioned. The discussion does not clarify the exact reasons for the rotation issue or the implications of different file formats.