Need to rewrite linear combination as vector expression.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on rewriting the sum of the form \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} r_i e_i^2\) using vector notation. The vectors \({\bf r}\) and \({\bf e}\) are defined as \({\bf r} = [r_1, r_2, \ldots, r_n]^T\) and \({\bf e} = [e_1, e_2, \ldots, e_n]^T\). The solution involves expressing the sum as \({\bf e}^T {\bf r} {\bf e}\), where \({\bf r}\) is represented as a diagonal matrix. This formulation allows for the simplification of the sum into a vector expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Familiarity with matrix representation of vectors
  • Knowledge of summation notation in linear algebra
  • Basic concepts of quadratic forms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study matrix representation of diagonal matrices
  • Learn about quadratic forms in linear algebra
  • Explore vector operations and their properties
  • Investigate the implications of linear combinations in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, vector calculus, or anyone involved in mathematical modeling using vectors.

devonho
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given vectors
<br /> {\bf r}=\left[r_1,r_2,r_3\ldots{}r_n\right]^T<br />
<br /> {\bf e}=\left[e_1,e_2,e_3\ldots{}e_n\right]^T<br />

I need to write the sum

<br /> \sum_{i=1}^{n}r_ie_i^2<br />

in terms of {\bf r} and {\bf e}

Homework Equations


Nil.

The Attempt at a Solution



Without r_i, I am able to write \sum_{i=1}^{n}e_i^2 as

<br /> \sum_{i=1}^{n}e_i^2={\bf e}^T{\bf e}<br />

If r_i can be independent of i I should be able to move it out of the summation. I am looking for some expansion/reexpression of r_i.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi devonho! :smile:
devonho said:
I need to write the sum

<br /> \sum_{i=1}^{n}r_ie_i^2<br />

in terms of {\bf r} and {\bf e}

why?? :confused:

(i don't think you can)
 
This seems to work:

<br /> {\bf r}=<br /> \left[<br /> \begin{array}{ccccc}<br /> r_1 &amp; 0 &amp; \ldots &amp; &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; r_2 &amp; &amp; &amp; \vdots \\<br /> \vdots &amp; &amp; r_3 &amp; &amp; \\<br /> &amp; &amp; &amp; \ddots &amp; \\<br /> 0 &amp; \ldots &amp; &amp; &amp; r_n \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right]<br />

<br /> {\bf e}=<br /> \left[<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> e_1 \\<br /> e_2 \\<br /> \vdots\\<br /> e_n \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right]<br />

<br /> {\bf e}^T{\bf re}=\left[ e_1, e_2 \ldots e_n\right]<br /> \left[<br /> \begin{array}{ccccc}<br /> r_1 &amp; 0 &amp; \ldots &amp; &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; r_2 &amp; &amp; &amp; \vdots \\<br /> \vdots &amp; &amp; r_3 &amp; &amp; \\<br /> &amp; &amp; &amp; \ddots &amp; \\<br /> 0 &amp; \ldots &amp; &amp; &amp; r_n \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right]<br /> \left[<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> e_1 \\<br /> e_2 \\<br /> \vdots\\<br /> e_n \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right]<br /> =r_1e_1^2+r_2e_2^2\ldots +r_ne_n^2<br /> =\sum_{i=1}^{n}r_ie_i^2<br />
 
but devonho, how do you form that middle matrix out of the vector r ? :confused:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K