Negative exponent in denominator

  • Thread starter Thread starter luvofgod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponent Negative
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of negative exponents in unit conversion, specifically in the context of a chemistry exam. Participants explore whether the application of a negative exponent in the denominator is acceptable mathematically and in chemistry, and whether the professor's marking of the answers was justified.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that using a negative exponent in the denominator is mathematically correct, suggesting it could be rewritten with a positive exponent in the numerator for clarity.
  • Another participant expresses frustration over the professor's refusal to reconsider the grading, indicating a lack of recourse in the situation.
  • There is a suggestion to seek support from a physics teacher to bolster the argument against the professor's decision.
  • A later reply questions whether there might have been other mistakes in the exam that could have contributed to the overall incorrect marking.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the appropriateness of the professor's grading, with some supporting the use of negative exponents while others suggest that the professor's perspective may be valid. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the professor's marking criteria.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the correctness of the unit conversion and the potential for other errors in the exam that could affect the final score.

luvofgod
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So, I took an exam on conversion of units in chemistry and I put a negative exponent on the bottom:

100s* 1nanoseconds/10^-9s = 10^11 ns,

Is this wrong? If it's possible in math, why not in chemistry? My professor marked all my answers wrong due to this. Is there any way to argue my reasoning? Thanks in advance.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
It is correct, although it would be better to write it with 10^9 ns in the numerator and 1 s in the denominator.

But it is right, and your chemistry teacher was wrong to mark it wrong.
 
What can I do? She will not give me the points back...
 
luvofgod said:
What can I do? She will not give me the points back...
I don't think there's much you can do, unfortunately. Take note, and do things the way she wants on future assignments and tests.
 
I think it is very clever. What was her argument about it being wrong? Maybe you can get a physics teacher on your side.
 
luvofgod said:
So, I took an exam on conversion of units in chemistry and I put a negative exponent on the bottom:

100s* 1nanoseconds/10^-9s = 10^11 ns,

Is this wrong? If it's possible in math, why not in chemistry? My professor marked all my answers wrong due to this. Is there any way to argue my reasoning? Thanks in advance.
What you've shown here is perfectly correct. Is it possible that you made mistakes in other parts of the problem that gave you the wrong final answer?

If you attach a scanned page from your marked test, we can tell you exactly where any mistake is (or if there is none).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
173K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
18K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K