New Book: Models of Atomic Nucleus (2006)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around the book "Models of Atomic Nucleus" published by Springer in 2006, which reviews historical models of the atomic nucleus, notably the 1965 Linus Pauling Close-Packed Spheron Model. The author highlights that this model has never been experimentally falsified yet remains largely ignored in scientific discourse. Additionally, a slide show by Dr. Cook on the Face-Centered-Cubic Lattice Model is mentioned as a significant contribution to the understanding of nuclear structure, particularly in relation to asymmetric fission.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic models, specifically the Linus Pauling Close-Packed Spheron Model
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics and its geometric interpretations
  • Knowledge of nuclear physics, particularly concepts of fission
  • Experience with scientific literature, including journals like Science and Nature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Linus Pauling Close-Packed Spheron Model and its implications in modern physics
  • Explore Dr. Cook's Face-Centered-Cubic Lattice Model and its applications in nuclear theory
  • Investigate the role of geometry in quantum mechanics and wave function visualization
  • Review recent advancements in nuclear physics literature to identify ongoing discussions about atomic models
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in nuclear physics, physicists interested in atomic models, and anyone exploring the historical context and developments in quantum mechanics.

Rade
I recently purchased a new book that reviews most historical models of the atomic nucleus:
http://www.brownstationers.com/BookItem.aspx?item=9783540285694

This is the only book on this subject in the past 40+ years that gives positive review (well--any review actually) for the 1965 Linus Pauling Close-Packed Spheron Model of the atomic nucleus. The author indicates that the Pauling model has never been experimentally falsified--it has been ignored. What a shame. Here we have a model published in the two leading journals of science (Science, Nature) and it receives no attention. I have posted on the Pauling model on another thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=86337&highlight=pauling+spheron+model
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is a very nice slide show by Dr. Cook on his "Face-Centered-Cubic Lattice Model" of the atomic nucleus--a major theme of his book cited above:
http://k9.physics.indiana.edu/~eric/QNP/QNP/QNP_2004_talks/session1_Monday/N_Cook.ppt#1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The slide show was very impressive, particularly the explanation of asymetric fission. The book is published by Springer and is available on Amazon here:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/3540285695/?tag=pfamazon01-20

When I've got a little more money in my paypal account I'll order a copy. My interest is in the masses of the hadrons, rather than nuclei, but I think the same principles should apply.

I think that one of the problems of QM in general has been a tendency to ignore the importance of geometry and visualization in understanding what can be described by wave functions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
11K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K