- #1
Rade
I recently purchased a new book that reviews most historical models of the atomic nucleus:
http://www.brownstationers.com/BookItem.aspx?item=9783540285694 [Broken]
This is the only book on this subject in the past 40+ years that gives positive review (well--any review actually) for the 1965 Linus Pauling Close-Packed Spheron Model of the atomic nucleus. The author indicates that the Pauling model has never been experimentally falsified--it has been ignored. What a shame. Here we have a model published in the two leading journals of science (Science, Nature) and it receives no attention. I have posted on the Pauling model on another thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=86337&highlight=pauling+spheron+model
http://www.brownstationers.com/BookItem.aspx?item=9783540285694 [Broken]
This is the only book on this subject in the past 40+ years that gives positive review (well--any review actually) for the 1965 Linus Pauling Close-Packed Spheron Model of the atomic nucleus. The author indicates that the Pauling model has never been experimentally falsified--it has been ignored. What a shame. Here we have a model published in the two leading journals of science (Science, Nature) and it receives no attention. I have posted on the Pauling model on another thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=86337&highlight=pauling+spheron+model
Last edited by a moderator: