New Calculated Trajectory for the Apophis asteroid

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the updated trajectory calculations for the Apophis asteroid and the implications of its reduced likelihood of an Earth encounter in 2036. Participants explore the statistical representation of these probabilities and the methods used in NASA's calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that NASA's updated calculations indicate a reduced probability of an encounter with Apophis, changing from one-in-45,000 to about four-in-a-million.
  • One participant questions why NASA does not simplify their probability fractions, suggesting that stating odds as one-in-a-million may sound more alarming than one-in-250,000.
  • Another participant expresses a preference for the one-in-a-million phrasing, arguing it conveys the rarity of the event more effectively.
  • A participant raises a question about the Factor of Safety used by NASA in their calculations, speculating whether the initial probabilities are intentionally conservative for publicity purposes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the presentation of probabilities and the motivations behind NASA's calculations. There is no consensus on the appropriateness of the statistical representations or the implications of the Factor of Safety.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not clarify the assumptions underlying NASA's calculations or the specific methodologies used, leaving some aspects of the discussion unresolved.

Astronomy news on Phys.org
That's Good News!

"Updated computational techniques and newly available data indicate the probability of an Earth encounter on April 13, 2036, for Apophis has dropped from one-in-45,000 to about four-in-a million."

Any particular reason NASA scientists can't reduce their fractions?

Does it just sound like better odds than 1-in-250,000 :smile:
 
Saladsamurai said:
Any particular reason NASA scientists can't reduce their fractions?

Does it just sound like better odds than 1-in-250,000 :smile:

Haha I was thinking the same thing my math teachers would have a hayday if they saw this!

but to the general population saying something has odds out of a million normally indicates that it's going to be an EXTREMELY RARE AND DEFINITLY UNLIKELY event that you shouldn't run out to bet on. :P
 
I like the 4 in a million way of describing it. That's 4x more probable than two one-in-a-million events: being electrocuted by lightning or dying of male breast cancer.
 
Anyone know what kind of Factor of Safety NASA uses in their calculations?

In the article it seemed as if all initial probabilities are on the very safe side. Are they just trying to scare us so they get a little publicity. I mean their intial calculation was 1-45,000 now it's 1-250,000??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K