The discussion revolves around the paper "Loophole-free Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen experiment via quantum steering" by Wittmann et al., which presents a new approach to testing quantum steering and its implications for local realistic theories. Participants explore the significance of the results, the methodology, and the context of publication, while raising questions about the validity and interpretations of the findings.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of the findings, particularly regarding the relationship between quantum steering and nonlocality. Multiple competing views remain on the interpretation of the results and the significance of the experimental setup.
Participants note limitations in the experimental design, such as assumptions made about measurement bases and the implications of optical losses, which remain unresolved in the discussion.
Yes, that's correct.harrylin said:As I understood all discussions until now, "nonlocal" means a correlation that can not be explained without something "spooky" as instantaneous "action at a distance". And I assumed that "Bell-nonlocality" is essentially the same, but with precise arguments that lead to that conclusion as presented by Bell.