New Theory of Time: Velocity Affects Time & Experiments to Prove it

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Francium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a proposed theory of time that suggests time is influenced by velocity, with implications for understanding time dilation and potential experimental validation. Participants explore theoretical, experimental, and conceptual aspects of time in relation to speed, particularly in the context of special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that time is not a dimension but a velocity, suggesting that time is affected by speed relative to other objects, with implications for how time is experienced on Earth.
  • Another participant argues that time dilation has not been conclusively tested at relativistic speeds, advocating for experiments involving spacecraft traveling close to the speed of light.
  • Some participants reference muon decay as evidence of time dilation, while others challenge its relevance to validating the dilation scale predicted by relativity.
  • A participant suggests that if the universe has a center of mass, time would effectively stop at that point, raising questions about the implications of such a theory.
  • There are discussions about the feasibility of testing time dilation using atomic clocks at different locations on Earth, questioning whether any observed dilation would support or refute the proposed theory.
  • Several participants express skepticism about the existence of an absolute center of the universe, with one noting that the term "universe" encompasses all that exists, complicating the idea of a central point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the validity of the proposed theory and the implications of time dilation. While some acknowledge the potential for experimental validation, others remain skeptical about the foundational assumptions of the theory and the applicability of existing evidence.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in current experimental capabilities, noting that no spacecraft capable of reaching significant fractions of the speed of light currently exists. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about the definitions and implications of time and velocity in the context of relativity.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in theoretical physics, time dilation, special relativity, and experimental validation of physical theories may find this discussion relevant.

  • #31
energia said:
we are having this discussion because it is a theory
"...still a theory..." implies that there is another condition above and beyond a theory that Relativity could become. This demonstrates a lack of understanding (its quite a common misconception, actually) of the http://phyun5.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node5.html , apparently an important reason why you continue to pursue ether "theory."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
for the last time...

I am not pursuing aether theory,
I don't give a rat's ass about aether theory

I clearly stated that I am only interested in pursuing absolute truth
using the sceintific method to arrive at the truth

which means putting all theories to the test

no matter how highly you or I regard Relativity Theory

it IS a theory
 
Last edited:
  • #33
russ_watters said:
Latitude - since the Earth rotates and it is flattened at the poles, there are both SR and GR effects at work with changing lattitude.

...and altitude too.

But the dilation from the speed of rotation is exactly canceled by the change in the gravitational redshift due to the flattening. Atomic clocks on the geoid are not adjusted for their latitude.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K