New to Forum: Proving f(n+3) -3f(n+2) + 3f(n+1)-f(n) = 0

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fabio010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equation f(n+3) - 3f(n+2) + 3f(n+1) - f(n) = 0, where f(n) is defined as the sum of the first n terms of an arithmetic progression. Participants explore the implications of this equation and the nature of f(n) in the context of arithmetic sequences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests testing the equation by defining a specific arithmetic progression, such as f(n) = n.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the meaning of f(-3n-6) in the context of the problem.
  • A participant elaborates on the general form of an arithmetic progression and provides a formula for f(n) based on the sum of its terms.
  • Participants discuss the need to calculate f(n+1), f(n+2), and f(n+3) to substitute into the original equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the validity of the equation for all arithmetic progressions, and participants express differing views on the implications of specific definitions and calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not resolved the meaning of f(-3n-6) and its relevance to the proof. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of arithmetic progressions and the definitions of the function f(n).

Fabio010
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Hi people, as you can see i am new in this forum.

Sorry if i am posting in wrong section.

Im going to try to traduce the problem.

" f(n) is the sum o n terms of a arithmetic progression. "
Show that :

f(n+3) -3f(n+2) + 3f(n+1)-f(n) = 0


I just want to know if

-3f(n+2) = f(-3n -6) ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Fabio,

couldn't you test this yourself? Why don't you define an arithmetic progression and try it out to see if it works?

EDIT: You could use the simplest arithmetic progression, f(n) = n
 
Oh, so easy.

Thanks, i never thought that i could define the arithmetic progression.
 
Well, what dacruick means is that you can use that particular sequence to "test" your hypothesis that -3f(n+2)= f(-3n- 6). In fact, since f(n) is defined as "the sum of the first n terms of an arithmetic sequence", I can't help but wonder what "f(-3n-6)" means! Of course, that would not prove the theorem that
f(n+3) -3f(n+2) + 3f(n+1)-f(n) = 0 for all n.

for all arithmetic progressions.

Any arithmetic progression is of the form a, a+ d, a+ 2d, ... with nth term a+ d(n-1)

The sum of n terms of that progression is a+ (a+d)+ (a+ 2d)+ ...+ a+d(n-1)= na+ d(1+ 2+...+ (n-1)). It is well known that 1+ 2+ ...+ n-1= n(n-1)/2 so that is f(n)= na+dn(n-1)/2.

Now, calculate f(n+1), f(n+2), f(n+3) and put them into the formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K