New to Planes, understanding them.

  • Thread starter Thread starter DOCMUR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planes
Click For Summary
Planes are conceptual 2D sections that help in understanding dimensions in mathematics, despite having no physical thickness. They are essential for calculations in real-world applications, such as determining the surface area of objects like spheres. While a plane has length and width, it lacks depth, making it an abstract tool for visualization and problem-solving. The discussion highlights the practical use of 2D concepts in scenarios like estimating paint needed for a surface area. Understanding planes is crucial for grasping more complex geometric and mathematical concepts.
DOCMUR
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello

I'm a grade 12 math student at WCI and I need some help with planes.
As I understand it planes are 2D sections of grid. 2D sections of grid can't exist in real space because they have no thickness. How can anyone need to use something that has no thickness, why can we ever imagine it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it's just like a line. a cube has length, width & depth. a plane has length & width, but no depth. a line only has length, no width or depth. a point doesn't have anything.
 
think of it as a thin imaginary sheet of space dividing one side of a 3 dimensional space from another.
 
think of it this way:

say i have a sphere made of metal. i want to paint the surface of that sphere, but i want to know exactly how much paint i will need. well, the amount of paint that i need will be equal to the surface area of the sphere.

notice that the surface giving me my surface area is 2D. Of course, the paint will have some thickness, but the surface area does not.

so there is a real-life situation where 2D works. on paint cans you will usually find a table showing how much paint you will need (volume) for such-and-such square feet (area).
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K