Newtonian derivation of Friedmann equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving the Friedmann equation for cosmology using Newtonian physics, specifically incorporating the cosmological constant. The user struggles with understanding how the cosmological constant applies a force in a spherical universe and seeks clarity on the units of various entities in the Einstein Field Equation (EFE). Key resources mentioned include a lecture PDF from Caltech and the Wikipedia page on the cosmological constant, which provides a relationship between the cosmological constant and energy density. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of understanding general relativity concepts for a comprehensive derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian mechanics and the force equation F=ma
  • Familiarity with the Einstein Field Equation and its components
  • Basic knowledge of cosmological concepts, including the cosmological constant
  • Dimensional analysis techniques in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study general relativity fundamentals, particularly through Misner, Wheeler & Thorne's textbook
  • Explore the derivation of the Friedmann equation from Newtonian mechanics in the provided Caltech lecture PDF
  • Investigate the units of the metric tensor, Ricci tensor, and energy-momentum tensor in the context of the Einstein Field Equation
  • Learn about the implications of the cosmological constant on cosmic expansion and energy density
USEFUL FOR

Students of cosmology, physicists interested in the intersection of Newtonian and relativistic physics, and anyone seeking to understand the implications of the cosmological constant in cosmological models.

Mike2
Messages
1,312
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to derive Friedmann's equation for cosmology using Newtonian physics. I've got the force equation F=ma for the case without a cosmological constant. But now I'm trying to incorporate the cosmological constant into this force equation.

But I'm having trouble seeing how the cosmological constant can appear to apply a force on some particle at the edge of a spherical universe of radius R. I thought that I might get somewhere through dimensional analysis if I could understant the units of the cosmological constant from its use in the Einstein Field Equation where it was initially introduced. But I find I don't know the units of any of the other entities in the EFE - the units for the metric gab or the Ricci tensor or the Ricci scalar or the energy-momentum tensor. Do the units change for different values of ab? It seems everyone likes using elaborate mathematics - and I don't see much practical use - not even dimensional units of the things they talk about. Any help out there? Thanks.
 
Space news on Phys.org
It isn't obvious that what you want to do is even possible. Why don't you do a course on general relativity first (or even just say the track one exercises in Misner, Wheeler & Thorne's book)?
 
cesiumfrog said:
It isn't obvious that what you want to do is even possible. Why don't you do a course on general relativity first (or even just say the track one exercises in Misner, Wheeler & Thorne's book)?
In the pdf file, starting with page 9, at:

http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~george/ay21/Ay21_Lecture02.pdf

the author derives the Friedmann equation from Newtonian mechanics using the force produced from the mass density of the universe.

And at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_Constant

the cosmological constant is expressed in terms of an energy density also as:

\[\Lambda = \frac{{8\pi G}}{{c^4 }}\rho vac\]

from which we can just as easily derive the Friedmann equation which includes the cosmological constant.

But I don't know how they got the last equation above. I think it may have something to do with the dimensional analysis of the terms in the Einstein field equations shown below. And I'm hoping someone here knows. Thank you.

\[Rab - \frac{1}{2}Rgab + \Lambda gab = 8\pi Tab\]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K