Does the Friedmann vacuum equation have a linear solution?

In summary, the conversation discusses the Friedmann vacuum equation and its linear solution in natural units, where the Planck length is defined as the smallest volume of space described by general relativity. It is also mentioned that the Weyl postulate and cosmological observations imply that space is expanding. The equation has a linear solution and the scaled mass density of the vacuum is not constant. This leads to the conclusion that the universe is described by Minkowski space.
  • #1
jcap
170
12
Does the Friedmann vacuum equation have a linear solution rather than an exponential one?

Using natural units one can write Friedmann's equation for the vacuum as
$$
\begin{eqnarray*}
\left(\frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2 &=& \frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho_{vac}\\\tag{1}
&=& L^2 \left(\frac{\rho_0}{L^4}\right)
\end{eqnarray*}
$$
where I define the Planck length ##L=(8\pi G \hbar / 3 c^3)^{1/2}##, ##\hbar = c = 1##, and ##\rho_0## is a dimenionless constant.

Now let us interpret the Planck length ##L## to be the size of the smallest volume of space that can be described by general relativity.

But the Weyl postulate, together with cosmological observations, also imply that space is expanding.

Therefore we must have
$$L = a(t) L_0\tag{2}$$
where ##L_0## is the Planck length measured at the reference time ##t_0## where ##a(t_0)=1##.

Inserting Eq.##(2)## into Eq.##(1)## we find
$$\left(\frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2 = L_0^2 \left(\frac{\rho_0}{a^2L_0^4}\right)\tag{3}$$
where the Friedmann equation ##(3)## has been rescaled in terms of the Planck length ##L_0## measured at the reference time ##t_0##.

Eq.##(3)## has a linear solution
$$a(t) = \frac{t}{t_0}.$$
The scaled mass density ##\rho(t)## of the vacuum is not constant but rather given by
$$\rho(t) = \frac{\rho_0}{a^2 L_0^4} = \frac{1}{t^2 L_0^2}.$$
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
jcap said:
Therefore we must have
L=a(t)L0​
(2)(2)L=a(t)L0L = a(t) L_0\tag{2}
where L0L0L_0 is the Planck length measured at the reference time t0t0t_0 where a(t0)=1a(t0)=1a(t_0)=1.
I see no a priori reason to assume this. Even if ##L## is the "smallest volume" describable by GR (which in itself is not part of GR, just an assumption based on quantum considerations) this volume in itself does not need to expand, in fact, it should not expand as it is an abstract concept rather than a physical volume.

What you have effectively done is to replace the vacuum energy by a spatial curvature term so your universe is empty. You are just describing Minkowski space.
 

1. What is the Friedmann vacuum equation?

The Friedmann vacuum equation is a mathematical equation used in cosmology to describe the evolution of the universe. It is based on Einstein's theory of general relativity and takes into account the effects of gravity on the expansion of the universe.

2. Does the Friedmann vacuum equation have a linear solution?

Yes, the Friedmann vacuum equation does have a linear solution. This solution is known as the "empty universe" solution, which describes a universe with no matter or energy present. In this case, the equation simplifies to a linear form.

3. How is the linear solution of the Friedmann vacuum equation derived?

The linear solution is derived by assuming a universe with no matter or energy, also known as a vacuum. This simplifies the equation to only include the effects of gravity, leading to a linear form. However, in reality, the universe is not completely empty, so this solution is only an approximation.

4. What are the limitations of the linear solution of the Friedmann vacuum equation?

The linear solution is only an approximation and does not accurately describe the universe as it exists. It does not take into account the effects of matter and energy, which are important components in the evolution of the universe. Therefore, it is only useful in certain scenarios and cannot fully explain the dynamics of the universe.

5. How does the linear solution of the Friedmann vacuum equation affect our understanding of the universe?

The linear solution helps us understand the behavior of the universe in the absence of matter and energy. It also serves as a starting point for more complex models that take into account the effects of matter and energy, allowing us to better understand the overall evolution of the universe. However, it is important to note that the linear solution is limited and cannot fully explain all aspects of the universe.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
157
  • Cosmology
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top