Newtons equation for gravitational force

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the periodic time T of the moon's orbit around the Earth, using Newton's equation for gravitational force and concepts from circular motion. The original poster expresses confusion about the relationship between the gravitational force, the radius of the Earth, and the moon's orbital radius.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of T using gravitational force equations and circular motion principles. Questions arise regarding the application of different radii (Earth's radius vs. moon's orbital radius) and the meaning of certain equations. Some participants share equations and suggest steps to clarify the relationship between the variables involved.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem, with some participants providing equations and insights that may help clarify the original poster's understanding. While the original poster expresses a sense of progress, there is still a lack of consensus on the best approach to take, and multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem due to the different contexts of gravitational force at the Earth's surface versus the moon's orbit. The original poster mentions having only studied up to chapter 12, indicating potential gaps in foundational knowledge that may affect their understanding of the topic.

louveargente
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The question: assuming that the moon circles the Earth in an orbit of radius d show thatthe periodic time T of the moon may be expressed as: T=2pi d sqrt d/r sqrt g where r is the radius of Earth and g is acceleration due to gravity on Earth's surface


i took up physics 2 to 3 months ago on my own and I am definitely missing something here
its eay to get Tsqrd=4pi Rcubed/GM but iv only readas faras chapter 12 and i can't think how to figure this out



can get T=2pi r sqrtr/sqrt GMbut not much more :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is fairly simple using Newtons equation for gravitational force and some circular motion equation for force involving period. Can you attempt to show the steps you've gone through already?

I'll write in latex the equation you're trying to find.

[tex]T=2\pi \frac{d\sqrt{d}}{r\sqrt{g}}[/tex]

Equations you'll need:

[tex]F = md \frac{4\pi^2}{T^2}[/tex]

[tex]F = G \frac{Mm}{d^2}[/tex]

[tex]g = G \frac{M}{r^2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
how is force equal to mass by distance by 4 pi squared all over period squared.i should prob know :{ i think i may be more lost than i thought. thanks for the equations i'l be back if i make progress! il read the chapterinside oput again.
 
pardon my typeing errors. physics is melting my brain. moreso! lol.
 
The first equation I posted is used when dealing with circular motion. I do not know if you've studied circular motion yourself.

There is a page here with various links to concise tutorials on the subject.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/circ.html
 
louveargente said:
how is force equal to mass by distance by 4 pi squared all over period squared.i should prob know :{ i think i may be more lost than i thought. thanks for the equations i'l be back if i make progress! il read the chapterinside oput again.

I think the only equations you really want to remember are i) F=ma, ii) F=GMm/r^2, and iii) a=v^2/r (for circular motion). Kurdt's first equation is just F=ma combined with a=v^2/r (and v expressed as 2*pi*r/T). Since you say you already have
T=2*pi*r*sqrt(r)/sqrt(GM), then you are almost there. Just look at F=mg=GMm/r^2 (Kurdt's last equation and combination of i) with ii)). Solve for GM and put that into your expression for T. Be careful, there are two different radii around (the radius of the orbit d and the radius of the Earth r) - be sure you use the correct one in each expression - because I haven't.
 
i don't understand how Earth's radius and gravity come into it. centripetal acceleration is equal to the force of gravitational attraction. the equations say its at the height or distance of the moons orbit d.
m*v squared/r =GMm/d squared. d is the distance of moons orbit from centre of earth.
the acceleration of grav or force of grav on Earth is completely different to that of moon in orbit with radius d as opposed to Earth's radius r??
am i raving?
 
louveargente said:
i don't understand how Earth's radius and gravity come into it. centripetal acceleration is equal to the force of gravitational attraction. the equations say its at the height or distance of the moons orbit d.
m*v squared/r =GMm/d squared. d is the distance of moons orbit from centre of earth.
the acceleration of grav or force of grav on Earth is completely different to that of moon in orbit with radius d as opposed to Earth's radius r??
am i raving?

You aren't raving, but you are looking in the wrong direction. You are correct that g at the Earth's surface has nothing to do with the orbit of the moon. But for some reason in the equation you are being asked to show they have substituted an expression for sqrt(GM) involving the Earth's radius and g. Find an equation to solve for GM involving those two variables.
 
thanks! :}

guys ye don't know how much ye've actually just helped me and now that i go over wat ye said it seems very clear! i think iv got it ;} right so it goes:
m*vsrd/d=GMm/dsqrd where d is moon orbital radius so vsqrd is GM/d.
then time T=2pid/v. make t a squared, sub in v squared end up with:
Tsqrd=4pi sqrd *dcubed/GM therefor Tsqrd*GM=4pi sqrd*dcubed and magically mathematically divide by the Earth radius squared (rsqrd) so that the T sqrd*GM/rsqrd becomes T sqrd*g. divide across get roots and end up with desired mad answer
T=2pid*sqrtd/r*sqrtg.
now i can sleep! you guys are brill:!) wen i figure out this physics stuff i promise il try to work out that latex thing that makes the maths look nicer
 
  • #10
I'm not personally very fond of questions like this that want you to make seemingly ridiculous substitutions. I'd personally prefer to leave it in terms of constants like G and the mass of the Earth. I suppose it helps you with your maths anyway.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K