Night skies in a contracting universe, would they look blue?

  • I
  • Thread starter Gerinski
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Universe
In summary, the more distant the radiating object, the more the light appears redshifted. The CMBR, which was emitted when the universe was 3000ºK, is redshifted to 3ºK. If the universe had been contracting all along, then there wouldn't be any CMB at all: the CMB was emitted when the plasma in the early universe cooled to become a transparent gas. The only way contraction makes sense is if it was a recent thing.
  • #1
Gerinski
323
15
We live in an expanding universe (at least in our epoch) so radiating sources in the cosmos look redshifted, the more the farther they are from us, with the limit being the CMBR which is redshifted to 3ºK when it was actually around 3000ºK when emitted.

Were we to live in a contracting universe, the cosmological sources would look blueshifted, with the limit being the CMBR with the highest blueshift. Does that mean the night skies would look blue, or even ultraviolet or even more, actually being deadly radiation such as X or gamma rays?

And in a related note, what would have to be the expansion or contraction rate at which the red / blueshifting would be actually zero, so we would see every cosmic source with its true frequency and the CMBR (the night skies) would look glowing with their actual 3000ºK colour as when it was emitted?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
If the universe had been contracting all along, then there wouldn't be any CMB at all: the CMB was emitted when the plasma in the early universe cooled to become a transparent gas.

The only way contraction makes sense is if it was a recent thing. The universe would still have been expanding for most of its history. So the CMB would still be cold, and very far-away objects would still have high redshifts. It would only be the relatively nearby objects which emitted their light since the contraction began that would be blueshifted. Exactly how that blueshift changes with distance would depend upon how quickly the contraction accelerated.

In the far future, the CMB would become hot again, which would destroy all life everywhere.
 
  • Like
Likes PeterDonis
  • #3
Thanks. Yes of course I meant that such hypothetical contraction would have to have started at an age of the universe so that Earth could have still have formed to its present state, but I presume that Earth could have still formed even if the start of contraction happened a few billion years ago (just guessing).
 
  • #4
Gerinski said:
3ºK
First off, there is no unit which is "degrees Kelvin", the unit is "Kelvin".

Gerinski said:
Were we to live in a contracting universe, the cosmological sources would look blueshifted, with the limit being the CMBR with the highest blueshift. Does that mean the night skies would look blue, or even ultraviolet or even more, actually being deadly radiation such as X or gamma rays?
There would be no CMBR. The CMBR originated in a time when the universe was hot and dense. If it contracted to a habitable state, it would not have been hot and dense earlier.

Gerinski said:
And in a related note, what would have to be the expansion or contraction rate at which the red / blueshifting would be actually zero, so we would see every cosmic source with its true frequency and the CMBR (the night skies) would look glowing with their actual 3000ºK colour as when it was emitted?
If you are talking about a universe that first expands and then contracts, the shift is not dependent on the expansion rate directly. It is proportional to the ratio of the scale factor of the universe now and the scale factor when the light was emitted.
 
  • #5
Orodruin said:
If you are talking about a universe that first expands and then contracts, the shift is not dependent on the expansion rate directly. It is proportional to the ratio of the scale factor of the universe now and the scale factor when the light was emitted.
Thanks Orodruin. I'm afraid I do not understand fully. Do you mean that as long as the scale factor between present and the CMBR emission time was >0, we would not observe any CMBR blueshifting? So that in practice blueshifting of the CMBR would not be observed until the size of the contracting universe would be the same or less as when the CMBR was emitted? Sorry not sure if that's what you meant, thank you in advance for clarifying.
 
  • #6
Gerinski said:
I'm afraid I do not understand fully. Do you mean that as long as the scale factor between present and the CMBR emission time was >0, we would not observe any CMBR blueshifting?
> 1. Otherwise correct.

Gerinski said:
So that in practice blueshifting of the CMBR would not be observed until the size of the contracting universe would be the same or less as when the CMBR was emitted?
Right.
 
  • #7
If the universe had contracted in the past, only objects nearer than the turnaround age would be blueshifted. The really far away stuff would remain redshifted.
 
  • #8
Chronos said:
If the universe had contracted in the past, only objects nearer than the turnaround age would be blueshifted. The really far away stuff would remain redshifted.
A bit further than that: nearer than when the scale factor was the same as it is now.
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin
  • #9
I assume we agree the universe would look very different than it does.
 

1. What causes the night sky to look blue?

The night sky appears blue due to the scattering of sunlight by Earth's atmosphere. The blue light has a shorter wavelength and is scattered more easily than other colors, making it the dominant color we see in the sky.

2. Would the night sky still appear blue in a contracting universe?

It is difficult to say for certain, as the color of the night sky is affected by many factors. However, if the universe was contracting, it is likely that the night sky would still appear blue due to the scattering of sunlight by the atmosphere.

3. How would a contracting universe affect the color of the night sky?

If the universe was contracting, it is possible that the night sky would appear bluer than it does in our current expanding universe. This is because the light from distant stars and galaxies would be shifted towards the blue end of the spectrum due to the Doppler effect.

4. Would the night sky look different in different parts of a contracting universe?

It is possible that the night sky would appear different in different regions of a contracting universe, depending on the density and composition of the atmosphere. For example, if there was a higher concentration of particles that scatter blue light, the night sky may appear bluer in those regions.

5. How would the contraction of the universe affect the overall appearance of the night sky?

The contraction of the universe would likely have a significant impact on the appearance of the night sky. As the universe contracts, the distance between stars and galaxies would decrease, causing the night sky to appear more crowded and potentially altering the positions and brightness of celestial objects.

Similar threads

Replies
57
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
993
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Back
Top