Nil Radical Proof: Proving A's Ideal is Non-Empty

  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonJo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Radical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The nil radical of an ideal A in a commutative ring with unity R is defined as N(A) = {r | r^n is in A for some positive integer n}. The discussion clarifies that the unity element is included in N(A) for all positive integers n, confirming that N(A) is non-empty. Participants express confusion regarding the distinction between definitions and proofs related to the nil radical, emphasizing the need for clarity in understanding the concept and its implications in ring theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of commutative rings with unity
  • Familiarity with the concept of ideals in ring theory
  • Knowledge of nilpotent elements and their properties
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of nilpotent elements in ring theory
  • Explore the relationship between ideals and their radicals in commutative algebra
  • Learn about the structure of commutative rings and their applications
  • Investigate examples of nil radicals in specific rings, such as polynomial rings
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying abstract algebra, ring theory, and anyone interested in the properties of ideals and nil radicals in commutative rings.

JasonJo
Messages
425
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Let A be any ideal of a commutative ring with unity R. Show that the nil radical of A, N(A)= {r|r^n is in A} where n is a positive integer, and n depends on r.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i don't quite understand the concept of the nil radical of A, what would be an element of this ideal? the unity element is in for every n a positive integer, so it's non empty but I'm still a little confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the equation you have a definition, or something you're asked to prove? If it's a definition, then what are you being asked to prove? If you're being asked to prove that equation, then what's the definition of N(A)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K