Nine Million Bicycles: Compare Versions of Katie Melua's Song

  • Thread starter Thread starter BobG
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the lyrical accuracy of Katie Melua's song "Nine Million Bicycles," particularly regarding the use of astronomical terms. Participants debate the appropriateness of the numbers mentioned, noting that light years measure distance, not time, which raises questions about the song's lyrical integrity. The conversation highlights the discrepancy between the song's lyrics and real-world statistics, such as the population of Beijing and the global population, which complicates the song's numerical claims. Ultimately, the discussion critiques the use of numbers in songwriting, suggesting that they often lead to confusion and misinterpretation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of lyrical analysis in music
  • Familiarity with astronomical concepts such as light years
  • Basic knowledge of global population statistics
  • Awareness of songwriting techniques and their impact on meaning
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of using astronomical terms in songwriting
  • Explore lyrical analysis techniques for popular music
  • Investigate the accuracy of statistics in song lyrics
  • Study the impact of numbers in music on audience perception
USEFUL FOR

Music enthusiasts, lyricists, songwriters, and anyone interested in the intersection of music and mathematics.

Which version of 9 Million Bicycles


  • Total voters
    4
BobG
Science Advisor
Messages
352
Reaction score
87
Which version of this Katie Melua song lyrics do you like better? The astronomically correct version for the original?
Nine Million Bicycles

Naturally, you have to assume she's referring to time and not distance or the last line wouldn't fit. :rolleyes: At least I hope.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I had to go with the 12, it just sounds better in the song.
 
I think picking some wrong number to plug in is just lazy song writing. And, actually, Simon's version is no better since they actually must be talking about distance since light years is a measure of distance, not time - or else she should have deleted the word "light" as well. It was still fun to listen to her try to squeeze all those syllables into the song and still try to maintain the tune. :smile:

Not only that, there's 10 million bicycles in Beijing and the world's population is closer to 7 billion than 6 billion (about 6.7 billion). Those numbers could partially be explained by the passage of time since the song was written, but it's harder to explain away 1.7 billion years or 80 billion light-years.

Numbers in songs usually don't work very well. Even Three Dog Night seemed a little uncertain about which number was the loneliest number and they didn't count any higher than two:

"Two can be as bad as one
It's the loneliest number since the number one"

and then in the next verse:

"One is the loneliest number, worse than two"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K