B NIST database and compressibility factor Z

AI Thread Summary
The NIST database offers extensive data on various fluids, including Nitrogen, across a wide range of pressures and temperatures. However, there are concerns regarding the accuracy of the compressibility factor data, as it may not align with established charts like Standing and Katz's. Users are questioning whether the NIST data is based on approximations or calculated using specific formulas. The original poster later found the reference articles that clarify the data sources. This highlights the importance of verifying data accuracy when using large databases for experimental research.
FranzSC
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Is NIST database accurate?
There's a huge volume of data on NIST database:
https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/fluid....nit=m/s&VisUnit=uPa*s&STUnit=N/m&RefState=DEF

I'm interested in getting extensive sets of experimental data for the compressibility factor of Nitrogen. Could not find them anywhere until now, so it seems strange to me that NIST has a huge database for all ranges of pressures and temperatures. Do any of you know if the data on NIST database are approximations calculated with some formulae? For example, the NIST data do not seem to represent the Standing and Katz's chart accurately. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My bad, I finally found the reference articles for the database. Sorry.
 

Thread 'The Effect of Linear and Rotational Motion on Measured Weight'

Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
View full post »

Thread 'Simple thought experiment with Stefan-Boltzmann law: energy'

Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
View full post »
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'

Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'

I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top