No coupling of Photons with eletric fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Photons do not couple with electric fields in classical electromagnetism; however, Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) reveals weak photon-photon scattering through virtual electron loops, known as Delbruck scattering. This phenomenon occurs at high photon energies (MeV to GeV gamma rays) interacting with the Coulomb field of a nucleus. The necessity for high photon energies is attributed to the stronger quantum corrections at smaller distances, which can be explored through advanced mathematical frameworks. Literature on this topic can be found in Greiner's textbook on quantum electrodynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Delbruck scattering principles
  • High-energy photon interactions
  • Understanding of Coulomb fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Delbruck scattering in detail through Greiner's textbook on quantum electrodynamics.
  • Research the mathematical framework of quantum corrections in QED.
  • Explore the effects of high-energy photons in particle physics.
  • Investigate the implications of electron-positron pair creation in heavy ion collisions.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in high-energy particle interactions and quantum field theory.

eintagsfliege
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I heard in the school a long time ago, that photons do not have a coupling with an electric field. Can someone explain it detailed? Does someone have good online literature?
Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eintagsfliege said:
I heard in the school a long time ago, that photons do not have a coupling with an electric field. Can someone explain it detailed? Does someone have good online literature?
I don't have time right now to explain it in detail but here's the basics...

Classically an electromagnetic field does not interact with itself.
But in Quantum Electrodynamics there is very weak higher-order
photon-photon scattering due to virtual electron loops. This
is called Delbruck scattering, and has been experimentally observed
via scattering of gamma rays off nuclei, iirc. I vaguely remember
that certain ultra-high-power lasers can also demonstrate the effect
somehow.

I don't know online references off the top of my head, but
Delbruck scattering is discussed in Greiner's textbook on
quantum electrodynamics.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the
I read in several Publications that Delbruck-effect is the scattering of high-energy photons (MeV to GeV gamma rays) on a Coulomb-Field of a Nucleus.
My question is:
Why is it needed that the Photonenergies are this high?
Which magnitude is required for the Coulomb-Field?
Is it possible that an electrostatic field of a charged object (same scale) has the same effect?

It is hard to find some good literature online.
 
eintagsfliege said:
Why is it needed that the Photonenergies are this high?
A full answer to this requires working through the detailed math to
see what the quantum correction terms look like. Some people
explain it heuristically by noting that quantum corrections to
the usual Coulomb potential get stronger at small distances.
With higher energies you can probe smaller distances and
thus have more hope of seeing weak effects because of th
stronger EM field.

But I take such explanations with a grain of salt.

Which magnitude is required for the Coulomb-Field?
Is it possible that an electrostatic field of a charged object
(same scale) has the same effect?
I suspect that if you tried to create such a huge electrostatic
field it would tend to decay via electron-positron pair creation.
(This sort of thing happens in heavy ion collisions.)

It is hard to find some good literature online.
I know. A visit to the nearest University physics library is
probably needed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K