No Non-Constant Entire Function $f(z)$ with $Re(f(z))<0$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Amer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether there exists a non-constant entire function \( f(z) \) such that \( \text{Re}(f(z)) < 0 \). Participants explore various proofs and approaches to demonstrate that such a function cannot exist, engaging in clarifications and corrections of each other's reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a proof by contradiction, assuming the existence of a non-constant function with \( \text{Re}(f(z)) < 0 \) and applying Liouville's theorem to conclude that \( f(z) \) must be constant.
  • Another participant critiques the initial proof for lack of clarity regarding the definitions of \( w_0 \) and \( r \), suggesting a more rigorous approach to establish the density of the image of an entire function.
  • A later reply provides a general theorem stating that if \( f \) is a non-constant entire function, then its image is dense in \( \mathbb{C} \), leading to the conclusion that if \( \text{Re}(f) < 0 \), \( f \) must be constant.
  • One participant expresses appreciation for the clarity of the second proof and clarifies their own definitions of \( w_0 \) and \( r \) in the context of their initial argument.
  • Another participant introduces a new function \( g(z) = e^{f(z)} \) and argues that if \( |g(z)| \leq 1 \), then by Liouville's theorem, \( g \) must be constant, leading to the conclusion that \( f'(z) = 0 \).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial proof's validity, with some agreeing on the need for clearer definitions while others introduce alternative arguments. The discussion contains multiple competing views and approaches to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in the initial proof regarding the definitions of variables and the assumptions made about the function's behavior. The discussion reflects varying levels of rigor in mathematical reasoning and proof structure.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in complex analysis, particularly those studying properties of entire functions and the implications of Liouville's theorem, may find this discussion relevant.

Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
Show that there is no non constant entire function f(z) such that $Re(f(z)) < 0 $

My solution, suppose there exist a non constant function with $Re(f(z)) < 0 $
Take the circle $|w - w_0| = r $ we choose $w_0, r$ such that the circle is in the right half plane like this
View attachment 2297

$f(z) $ is entire, and $|f(z) - w_0| > r $ for all z
Let
$g(z) = \dfrac{1}{f(z) - w_0} $, g is entire function since the denominator dose not vanish ( =/= zero ) and g(z) is bounded
$ |g(z) | = \dfrac{1}{ |f(z) - w_0|} < \dfrac{1}{r}$
By Liouville's theorem, any bounded entire function must be constant so g(z) is constant, f(z) is constant Contradiction.

But my Pro said my solution is not Ok, where is the mistake ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For one thing your proof is a sloppy. What is $w_0$? You never define it. What is $r$? How are you defining them?

Here is a more precise way to say what you want to say. We will greatly generalize your theorem.

Definition: A subset $D$ of $\mathbb{C}$ is called dense if and only if the closure of $D$ is $\mathbb{C}$. In other words, every point of $p\in \mathbb{C}$ has the property that the disk $\Delta(p,r) $ intersects $D$ for every $r>0$.
In fancy language,
$$ \forall p\in \mathbb{C},~ \forall r > 0,~ \Delta(p,r) \cap D \not = \emptyset$$

Negating this statement tells us that if $D$ is not dense then,
$$ \exists p\in \mathbb{C}, \exists r > 0, ~ \Delta(p,r)\cap D = \emptyset $$

Theorem: If $f:\mathbb{C}\to \mathbb{C}$ is an entire function which is non-constant then the image of $f$ is dense set of $\mathbb{C}$.

Corollary: Given the same as above in theorem, if $\text{Re}(f) < 0$ then $f$ must be constant. (Your problem).

Now we prove the theorem.

Proof: Suppose it aint true that the image $I$ is dense. Then there is a $p\in \mathbb{C}$ and $r>0$ such that the disk $\Delta(p,r) \cap I = \emptyset$. This means for any $w\in I$ we have that $w\not \in \Delta(p,r) \implies |p-w|\geq r$. Since $I$ is the image set it follows that $|p-f(z)|\geq r$ for all $z\in \mathbb{C}$. Now define the function,
$$ g(z) = \frac{1}{f(z) - p} $$
This function $g$ is entire and as you said,
$$ |g(z)| = \frac{1}{|f(z)-p|} \leq \frac{1}{r} $$
Thus, $g$ is a bounded as you said forces $f(z)$ to be constant by Liouville which is a contradiction.
 
Thanks, I picked them in the picture!.
I picked $w_o $ and $r$ such the points $w$ that satisfies $|w - w_o| = r $ are in the right half plane.
for exmaple $w_o = (2,2) $ and $r = 1$

Thanks again.
In fact I build my work after I read that the Image of the Entire function is dense.
Your proof is very clean and clear.:D
 
Consider the following function

$$g(z)=e^{f(z)}=e^{Re(f(z))}e^{iIm(f(z))}$$

Then this function is entire and

$$|g(z)|\leq e^{Re(z)} \leq 1$$

By Liouville theorem $g$ is constant hence $g'=0$

$$g'=f'(z) e^{f(z)}= 0$$ hence we have $f'(z)=0$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K