No Non-Constant Entire Function $f(z)$ with $Re(f(z))<0$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Amer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

There is no non-constant entire function \( f(z) \) such that \( \text{Re}(f(z)) < 0 \). The proof utilizes Liouville's theorem, establishing that if \( f(z) \) is entire and bounded, then it must be constant. The discussion clarifies that if the image of \( f \) is not dense in \( \mathbb{C} \), it leads to a contradiction, confirming that \( f(z) \) cannot be non-constant under the given condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of entire functions in complex analysis
  • Familiarity with Liouville's theorem
  • Knowledge of the concept of dense sets in topology
  • Basic proficiency in complex function notation and properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Liouville's theorem on bounded entire functions
  • Explore the properties of dense subsets in the complex plane
  • Investigate the behavior of entire functions and their images
  • Learn about the relationship between the real part of complex functions and their constancy
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, complex analysts, and students studying complex analysis who are interested in the properties of entire functions and their implications in the field.

Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
Show that there is no non constant entire function f(z) such that $Re(f(z)) < 0 $

My solution, suppose there exist a non constant function with $Re(f(z)) < 0 $
Take the circle $|w - w_0| = r $ we choose $w_0, r$ such that the circle is in the right half plane like this
View attachment 2297

$f(z) $ is entire, and $|f(z) - w_0| > r $ for all z
Let
$g(z) = \dfrac{1}{f(z) - w_0} $, g is entire function since the denominator dose not vanish ( =/= zero ) and g(z) is bounded
$ |g(z) | = \dfrac{1}{ |f(z) - w_0|} < \dfrac{1}{r}$
By Liouville's theorem, any bounded entire function must be constant so g(z) is constant, f(z) is constant Contradiction.

But my Pro said my solution is not Ok, where is the mistake ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For one thing your proof is a sloppy. What is $w_0$? You never define it. What is $r$? How are you defining them?

Here is a more precise way to say what you want to say. We will greatly generalize your theorem.

Definition: A subset $D$ of $\mathbb{C}$ is called dense if and only if the closure of $D$ is $\mathbb{C}$. In other words, every point of $p\in \mathbb{C}$ has the property that the disk $\Delta(p,r) $ intersects $D$ for every $r>0$.
In fancy language,
$$ \forall p\in \mathbb{C},~ \forall r > 0,~ \Delta(p,r) \cap D \not = \emptyset$$

Negating this statement tells us that if $D$ is not dense then,
$$ \exists p\in \mathbb{C}, \exists r > 0, ~ \Delta(p,r)\cap D = \emptyset $$

Theorem: If $f:\mathbb{C}\to \mathbb{C}$ is an entire function which is non-constant then the image of $f$ is dense set of $\mathbb{C}$.

Corollary: Given the same as above in theorem, if $\text{Re}(f) < 0$ then $f$ must be constant. (Your problem).

Now we prove the theorem.

Proof: Suppose it aint true that the image $I$ is dense. Then there is a $p\in \mathbb{C}$ and $r>0$ such that the disk $\Delta(p,r) \cap I = \emptyset$. This means for any $w\in I$ we have that $w\not \in \Delta(p,r) \implies |p-w|\geq r$. Since $I$ is the image set it follows that $|p-f(z)|\geq r$ for all $z\in \mathbb{C}$. Now define the function,
$$ g(z) = \frac{1}{f(z) - p} $$
This function $g$ is entire and as you said,
$$ |g(z)| = \frac{1}{|f(z)-p|} \leq \frac{1}{r} $$
Thus, $g$ is a bounded as you said forces $f(z)$ to be constant by Liouville which is a contradiction.
 
Thanks, I picked them in the picture!.
I picked $w_o $ and $r$ such the points $w$ that satisfies $|w - w_o| = r $ are in the right half plane.
for exmaple $w_o = (2,2) $ and $r = 1$

Thanks again.
In fact I build my work after I read that the Image of the Entire function is dense.
Your proof is very clean and clear.:D
 
Consider the following function

$$g(z)=e^{f(z)}=e^{Re(f(z))}e^{iIm(f(z))}$$

Then this function is entire and

$$|g(z)|\leq e^{Re(z)} \leq 1$$

By Liouville theorem $g$ is constant hence $g'=0$

$$g'=f'(z) e^{f(z)}= 0$$ hence we have $f'(z)=0$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K