Non approachable physic topics?

  • Thread starter HyperStrings
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation revolved around the rules of the forum, specifically the ban on discussing the EM drive and Planet X. The speaker expressed frustration with the strict guidelines and perceived censorship of new ideas. However, other members pointed out that the forum's focus is on established science and that new ideas should be presented through peer-reviewed journals. The forum's Planet X guideline was also discussed, with some members suggesting it should be updated to reflect recent discoveries. Ultimately, the conversation ended with the reminder to wait for credible evidence before discussing the EM drive project on the forum.
  • #1
HyperStrings
14
1
I noticed in the rules, that we are not allowed to discuss the EM drive and the forum states that "no one" in the world is working on it and it is basically a figment of your imagination. that is completely false.
Also, no discussion on planet X? Yet its basically a completely confirmed fact that there is a planet X.
I don't understand how this community can be so obtuse. I find a lot of borderline fascists positions in the rules. It is very unsettling to me that this is the state of affairs. Why is there such defensiveness against proposing some idea and working on it? I saw a topic blocked where a person was working on merging pilot waves and dark matter, yet in a very draconian manner was silenced. That is not progress in the name of physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
HyperStrings said:
That is not progress in the name of physics
We're not doing 'progress' here, though. At least not in a straightforward way. We're dedicated to helping people understand the established science.
Scientific progress is done mainly in peer-reviewed journals. If somebody has a new idea that they feel they can present in a rigorous manner, they should take it to one of such journals. Trying to do it here detracts from the stated mission of the forum much in the same way as replacing physics curriculum with discussions of pupils' half-baked ideas would detract from the mission of education in schools.
Once the students are equipped with the necessary tools, they can apply them to working on new science via appropriate routes.

HyperStrings said:
Also, no discussion on planet X? Yet its basically a completely confirmed fact that there is a planet X.
It's likely you mean the plethora of recently-discovered trans-neptunian objects, which with some leniency might get branded as planet 'X' by popular science. In the context of the banned topics, 'planet X' relates to the crank idea of 'Nibiru', and all the baggage that it brings with it (googling should paint the general picture).
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, Dale, 1oldman2 and 1 other person
  • #3
A family member of mine has been studying education practices for 40 years. The new paradigm of education is allowing students to try work on answering questions, even if their theories are half baked. You are looking at the old world view of education, and much has changed. At least I know now this forum is, "not doing progress here'.
Secondly, the gravitational relationships of cosmic debris in peer reviewed research has shown to be associated with a massive body far outside the solar system.
Thirdly, they state no discussion on EM drive and no 'blogs'. Yet, in the thread that closed the discussion of the EM drive he uses 2 blogs as references, to 'debunk' the persons discussion. Why is there a double standard there?
 
  • #4
  • #5
We are open to discussing the EM drive project once it is accepted by a reputable peer review journal. If the project is credible then the wait shouldn't be long. Until then we wait. Thanks for your feedback.
 
  • #6
Ygggdrasil said:
The Planet X guideline does not seem to refer to the recent discovery by Brown and Batygin, and should probably be updated to reflect the new work (which was nominated by the journal Science as a contender for their Breakthrough of the Year award):
https://www.caltech.edu/news/caltech-researchers-find-evidence-real-ninth-planet-49523
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22/meta
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/11/vote-your-scientific-breakthrough-year
Ygggdrasil, The Planet X reference is about doomsday and apocalypse nonsense as Bandersnatch pointed out, it does not prevent discussions of real science. Great links BTW!
 

Related to Non approachable physic topics?

1. What are some examples of non approachable physics topics?

Some examples of non approachable physics topics are quantum mechanics, string theory, dark matter, black holes, and the nature of time.

2. Why are these topics considered non approachable?

These topics are considered non approachable because they involve complex mathematical concepts and theories that are often difficult for the average person to understand.

3. Can non-scientists understand these topics?

While it may be challenging for non-scientists to fully grasp these topics, with some effort and dedication, it is possible to gain a basic understanding of them.

4. Are there any resources available for non-scientists to learn about these topics?

Yes, there are many resources available such as books, documentaries, and online lectures that explain these topics in a more accessible way for non-scientists.

5. How can understanding these topics benefit society?

Understanding these topics can lead to advancements in technology and our understanding of the universe, which can have a positive impact on society. Additionally, learning about these topics can expand our knowledge and perspective on the world around us.

Similar threads

Replies
86
Views
4K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
2
Views
528
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
764
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
6
Replies
175
Views
7K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
326
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top