Non-degenerate Hermitian Matrices and their Eigenvalues

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the existence of a non-degenerate 2x2 matrix that possesses only real eigenvalues while not being Hermitian. The matrix presented, [[1, 2], [3, 2]], has eigenvalues of 4 and -1, confirming it is non-degenerate and has real eigenvalues. The confusion arose from the eigenvalue equation eigenvalue = [(a+b) +/- sqrt((a-b)^2 - 4cd)] / 2, which initially led to contradictory results. Ultimately, the simplification process clarified that the matrix example is valid and consistent with the properties discussed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of non-degenerate matrices
  • Familiarity with Hermitian matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of eigenvalue calculations for 2x2 matrices
  • Proficiency in quadratic equations and their solutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian matrices in linear algebra
  • Learn about eigenvalue decomposition and its applications
  • Explore the implications of non-degenerate matrices in various mathematical contexts
  • Investigate the derivation and applications of the characteristic polynomial
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians exploring matrix theory, and anyone interested in the properties of eigenvalues and matrix classifications.

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


Is there a non-degenerate 2x2 matrix that has only real eigenvalues but is not Hermitian? (Either find such a matrix, or prove that it doesn't exist)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's my problem. I'm getting Contradicting results.

So, I found this 2x2 matrix:
\begin{matrix}
1 & 2 \\
3 & 2
\end{matrix}

This matrix has eigenvalues of 4 and -1.

This matrix is not hermitian as the hermitian representation of this matrix transposes it.

Therefore this matrix is a 2x2 matrix that is non-degenerate and is NOT hermitian and has ONLY real eigenvalues.

This should be the example that the question was looking for.

However, in my notes, I have the equation for eigenvalues being
eigenvalue = [(a+b)+/- (squareroot ((a-b)^2-4cd))]/2

where
\begin{matrix}
a & c \\
d & b
\end{matrix}

And if we take this representation, we get negative eigenvalues.

What is going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:
However, in my notes, I have the equation for eigenvalues being
eigenvalue = [(a+b)+/- (squareroot ((a-b)^2-4cd))]/2

where
\begin{matrix}
a & c \\
d & b
\end{matrix}

And if we take this representation, we get negative eigenvalues.

What is going on here?
Are you sure about that equation?
I find, by expanding ##\det(A-\lambda I)=0## and solving the quadratic equation:
##\lambda=\frac{(a+b)\pm\sqrt{(a+b)²-4(ab-cd)}}{2}##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Yes, I agree with what you are saying, and I noticed that as well, however, if you simplify it further:

(a+b)^2 = a^2+b^2+2ab
So then, 2ab-4ab becomes -2ab.

so now we have a^2+b^2-2ab-4cd
but a^2+b^2-2ab is just (a-b)^2 and so we get
(a-b)^2-4cd.

which is why I am getting contradictory results.
What is going wrong?
 
RJLiberator said:
Yes, I agree with what you are saying, and I noticed that as well, however, if you simplify it further:

(a+b)^2 = a^2+b^2+2ab
So then, 2ab-4ab becomes -2ab.

so now we have a^2+b^2-2ab-4cd
but a^2+b^2-2ab is just (a-b)^2 and so we get
(a-b)^2-4cd.

which is why I am getting contradictory results.
What is going wrong?
It should be ##+4cd## after the simplification.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Ah...yes, that was the source of my frustration.

So, it seems my example now holds up and has nothing contradicting it.

Thank you kindly.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K