Non-Orientable Quantum Surface

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JPBenowitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Surface
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of non-orientable quantum surfaces, particularly in relation to P-Violation and the behavior of neutrinos. It establishes that while left-handed neutrinos can transform into right-handed anti-neutrinos in a non-orientable universe, the challenge lies in maintaining causality due to the arrow of time. The conversation highlights the distinction between spinors and vectors, emphasizing that spinors require a 720-degree rotation to return to their original state, which complicates the definition of handedness and charge on non-orientable surfaces. Ultimately, the discussion concludes that while information is conserved, its distinguishability diminishes over time, leading to increased entropy and a preserved arrow of time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of P-Violation in particle physics
  • Familiarity with spinors and their properties in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of non-orientable surfaces in topology
  • Concept of the arrow of time and its implications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of P-Violation on particle interactions
  • Explore the mathematical properties of spinors in quantum field theory
  • Study the characteristics and examples of non-orientable surfaces in topology
  • Investigate the relationship between entropy and the arrow of time in thermodynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students studying advanced topics in particle physics and topology.

JPBenowitz
Messages
144
Reaction score
2
I've heard that the universe could not possibly be non-orientable because of P-Violation such that a left-handed neutrino would transform into a right-handed neutrino which do not exist do to the left-right asymmetry of the universe. However this problem is resolvable because charge would also be flipped in a non-orientable universe thus we would be left with a right-handed anti-neutrino. The actual problem arises with the arrow of time. A non-orientable spacetime would be akin to a closed timelike curve and causality loses its meaning.

On the other hand, there is a difference between a spinor and a vector when defining left and right handedness. Spinors require a 720 degree rotation to return to their original state not a 360 degree rotation required by a vector. So in the sense of preserving an arrow of time when an observer traverses back to the start they did not arrive back at the same physical system. So why is it that a non-orientable universe is impossible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spinors require a 720 degree rotation to return to their original state not a 360 degree rotation required by a vector.
Common misconception. Spinors change sign under a 360-degree rotation. But spinors are double-valued. So under the rotation all spinors simply change their sign, and the physical state is unchanged.
 
Bill_K said:
Common misconception. Spinors change sign under a 360-degree rotation. But spinors are double-valued. So under the rotation all spinors simply change their sign, and the physical state is unchanged.

Right, but we can treat a mirror-image as a 180 degree rotation such that the mirror image of a vector and a spinor are not the same. If spin was a vector then on a non-orientable surface both the direction of spin and momentum would be flipped and a particle would retain its handedness. The problem is really with no global definition of handedness or charge on a non-orientable surface. At one point in time as the system evolves you can distinguish charge and handedness, there is information present but then after a sufficient enough time you no longer would be able to distinguish them. Where did the information go? We know information is conserved at all times just like energy is conserved at all times.

Analogously, a point on this non-orientable surface cannot possibly be a single point in time they must be separated by something that behaves like a delayed choice quantum eraser where in this sense "which-handedness" information is erased and we are left with a probability distribution of possible states. Information is conserved but the entropy of the system increases and thus would preserve an arrow of time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
580
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K