Non Stieltjes integrable function

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Damidami
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Damidami
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
I know that this function [itex]f : [-2,2] \to \mathbb{R}[/itex]
[itex]f(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & \textrm{ if } x \geq 0 \\ 0 & \textrm{ if } x < 0 \end{cases}[/itex]
is not Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with itself (that is, taking [itex]g = f[/itex] then [itex]f \not\in R(g)[/itex])
That is because both share a point of discontinuity, namely 0.

What I don't know is how do I justify this? for which partition does the limit of the superior sums and the inferior sums don't equal? Shouldn't this integral be equal to 1? (all the terms in the sum cancel except at zero, where [itex]\triangle g = 1-0 = 1[/itex], and [itex]f(0) = 1[/itex]

I think I'm not seeing it correctly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Damidami said:
[itex]f(0) = 1[/itex]

In computing the upper and lower sums, the contribution of an interval like [-0.1, 0] involves more than f(0). You have to use the infimum of f on the interval when computing the lower sum.

I found a PDF of class notes that supposedly proves the theorem that if the two functions share a common point of discontinuity then they are not Riemann-Stieljes integrable. (page 3 of 5) It looks like it's hard to prove!

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...sg=AFQjCNEL7sm8dOrwngWsUyk-yVKajXGqQA&cad=rja