Non-Uniform circular motion with friction

Knissp
Messages
72
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small block of mass m slides on a horizontal frictionless surface as it travels around the inside of a hoop of radius R. The coefficient of friction between the block and the wall is mu; therefore, the speed v of the block decreases. In terms of m, R. mu, and v, find expressions for each of the following.
b. The block's tangential acceleration dv/dt
c. The time required to reduce the speed of the block from an initial value v0 to vo/3
(A diagram is given here on page 4: www.swcp.com/~gants/calendars/ap%20physics/sept%20docs/(A)%20Newton's%20LawsC.doc)

Homework Equations


dv/dt = aT = tangential acceleration
aA = angular acceleration
aC = centripetal acceleration
v/r=w (angular velocity)

The Attempt at a Solution


First I tried to use aT = r * aA = r * d^2 (theta) / dt^2 but I don't think that's right because none of those values are given.
Then I tried to do
Fnet = m * (aC^2 + aT^2)^(1/2) = ((m*v^2/r)^2+(m*aT - mu*m*v^2/r))^(1/2)
but I think that's wrong because I'm taking taking the forces and finding the vector sum of them and I don't know if that's allowed like I can do with the (aC^2 + aT^2)^(1/2) to get acceleration.

Perhaps would it help for me to know that dv/dt = dv/dx * dx/dt = v*dv/dx?? I'm kind of lost, any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The only tangential force is friction. What does that equal? (Hint: What's the normal force?)
 
Is this correct?

F = m * dv/dt = mu*m*v^2/r

dv/dt = mu*v^2/r
 
Looks good to me.
 
Yay. :smile: Thank you so much.
 
Wait, tangential acceleration is supposed to be negative, right? So is it supposed to be -mu*v^2/r or is something done wrong?

And just to make sure, for part c where it asks about the time required to reduce speed from v0 to 1/3*v0, is it:
dv/dt = a = -mu*v^2/r

2/3*v / delta(t) = -mu*v^2/r

(-2*r)/(3*mu*v) = delta(t)

But that doesn't make sense because the change in time cannot be negative.

-EDIT: never mind about the time being negative part. haha i know the change in velocity has to be -2/3 because its 1/3 v - 1 v. and the negative of the negative 2/3 makes it positive.
but can you still check everything else?
 
Last edited:
Knissp said:
Wait, tangential acceleration is supposed to be negative, right? So is it supposed to be -mu*v^2/r or is something done wrong?
Right. It should be negative.

And just to make sure, for part c where it asks about the time required to reduce speed from v0 to 1/3*v0, is it:
dv/dt = a = mu*v^2/r
That should be:
dv/dt = -mu*v^2/r

2/3*v / delta(t) = mu*v^2/r

(2*r)/(3*mu*v) = delta(t)
This is not correct. Don't assume the acceleration is constant (the velocity is not). Integrate! ([itex]dv/dt \neq \Delta v / \Delta t[/itex])
 
Is this right?

dv/dt = a = -mu*v^2/r

integral(dv/v^2) = integral (-mu/r dt)

-1/v = -mu/r * delta(t)

delta (t) = r/(v*mu)

And isn't acceleration constant? I know velocity is not.
 
Knissp said:
Is this right?

dv/dt = a = -mu*v^2/r

integral(dv/v^2) = integral (-mu/r dt)
Good.

-1/v = -mu/r * delta(t)

delta (t) = r/(v*mu)
Evaluate the integral properly:
[tex]\int_{v_0}^{v_0/3}(1/v^2) dv = -\int\mu/r dt[/tex]

And isn't acceleration constant? I know velocity is not.
How can it be constant if it depends on velocity?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K