Nordstrom Gravity: Exploring R w/ Minkowski & Schwarzschild Metrics

  • Thread starter Thread starter beans73
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on G. Nordstrom's theory of gravity, specifically the relationship between the metric tensor \( g_{\mu\nu} \) and the stress-energy tensor \( T^{\mu\nu} \) through the equation \( R = \kappa g_{\mu\nu} T^{\mu\nu} \). Participants clarify that the correct form of the metric is \( g_{\mu\nu} = e^{2\Phi} \eta_{\mu\nu} \), where \( \eta_{\mu\nu} \) is the flat Minkowski metric. The discussion emphasizes the importance of calculating the Christoffel coefficients, which do not vanish due to the dependence of \( \Phi \) on spacetime coordinates, and highlights the need to apply the Schwarzschild metric for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts, particularly metric tensors.
  • Familiarity with the Minkowski metric and its properties.
  • Knowledge of Christoffel symbols and their role in geodesic equations.
  • Basic understanding of the Ricci scalar and its calculation in curved spacetime.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Christoffel symbols for the metric \( g_{\mu\nu} = e^{2\Phi} \eta_{\mu\nu} \).
  • Learn how to calculate the Ricci scalar \( R \) in the context of Nordstrom's theory.
  • Explore the Schwarzschild metric and its applications in general relativity.
  • Investigate the implications of Weyl curvature and its vanishing condition in gravitational theories.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those studying general relativity and gravitational theories, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of gravity and spacetime metrics.

beans73
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Question: "A theory of gravity devised by physicist G. Nordstrom, relates g_{μ\nu} to T^{μ\nu} by the equation:

R=κg_{μ\nu}T^{μ\nu}

where the metric has the form g_{μ\nu}=e^{2\Phi} with \Phi=\Phi(x^{μ}) a function of the spacetime coordinates (the special form of the metric follows from requiring the vanishing of the Weyl curvature tensor _{αβγδ}=0

a) Show that in the Newtonian limit \Phi^{2}<<1 the geodesic equation for a test body moving slowly in this spacetime reproduces the kinematics of Newtonian gravity.

b) Calculate the ricci scalar R in the Newtonian limit showing that it is just a second order differential operator acting on \Phi.



The Attempt at a Solution



My first question is really just about the metric i need to use. from a couple of things I've read on the internet, it seems i should just use the simple flat-space minkowski metric (ct, x, y, z), but i am not really sure how to calculate the christoffel coefficients in this metric as all g_{μ\nu} must be a function of r (from \Phi=2GM/r). wouldn't that mean that the christoffel coefficients all vanish (ie. ∂_{t}g_{xx}=0)? does this mean i need to use the shwarzschild metric??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
beans73 said:

Homework Statement



Question: "A theory of gravity devised by physicist G. Nordstrom, relates g_{μ\nu} to T^{μ\nu} by the equation:

R=κg_{μ\nu}T^{μ\nu}

where the metric has the form g_{μ\nu}=e^{2\Phi} with \Phi=\Phi(x^{μ}) a function of the spacetime coordinates (the special form of the metric follows from requiring the vanishing of the Weyl curvature tensor _{αβγδ}=0

a) Show that in the Newtonian limit \Phi^{2}<<1 the geodesic equation for a test body moving slowly in this spacetime reproduces the kinematics of Newtonian gravity.

b) Calculate the ricci scalar R in the Newtonian limit showing that it is just a second order differential operator acting on \Phi.



The Attempt at a Solution



My first question is really just about the metric i need to use. from a couple of things I've read on the internet, it seems i should just use the simple flat-space minkowski metric (ct, x, y, z), but i am not really sure how to calculate the christoffel coefficients in this metric as all g_{μ\nu} must be a function of r (from \Phi=2GM/r). wouldn't that mean that the christoffel coefficients all vanish (ie. ∂_{t}g_{xx}=0)? does this mean i need to use the shwarzschild metric??

You're missing some things, g_{μ\nu}=e^{2\Phi} doesn't make sense, since the left-hand side is a tensor and the right-hand side is a scalar. What you want is (referring to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordström's_theory_of_gravitation#Features_of_Nordstr.C3.B6m.27s_theory)

$$ g_{\mu\nu} = e^{2\Phi} \eta_{\mu\nu},$$

where ##\eta_{\mu\nu}## is indeed the flat Minkowski metric. Since ##\Phi## is a function of the ##x^\mu##, the Christoffel symbols for ##g_{\mu\nu}## will not vanish, but because of the high amount of symmetry, they will have somewhat simple expressions.

It is not the case that ∂_{t}g_{xx}=0, rather ∂_{t}g_{xx}=2e^{2\Phi}(∂_{t}\Phi).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K