Computing Riemann Tensor: 18 Predicted Non-Trivial Terms

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on computing the Riemann Tensor for the metric defined by the equation $$ds^2 = dr^2+(r^2+b^2)d \theta^2 +(r^2+b^2)\sin^2 \theta d \phi^2 -dt^2$$. The user predicts 18 potential non-trivial components based on the antisymmetry and symmetry properties of the Riemann tensor, specifically referencing the equation $$R_{\mu \nu \rho \sigma}=-R_{\nu \mu \rho \sigma}=-R_{\mu \nu \sigma \rho}=R_{\rho \sigma \mu \nu}$$. Upon verification using Mathematica, only 12 non-trivial terms are confirmed, with three specific terms yielding non-zero values: $$R_{r \theta r \theta}=\frac{-b^2}{b^2+r^2}$$, $$R_{r \phi r \phi}=\frac{-b^2 \sin^2 (\theta)}{b^2 +r^2}$$, and $$R_{\theta \phi \theta \phi}=\frac{b^2 \sin^2 (\theta)}{b^2 +r^2}$$. The user seeks clarification on an additional non-trivial term that remains unaccounted for.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann Tensor properties, specifically antisymmetry and symmetry.
  • Familiarity with diagonal metrics in general relativity.
  • Proficiency in using Mathematica for tensor calculations.
  • Knowledge of differential geometry concepts related to curvature.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of the Riemann Tensor in detail, focusing on antisymmetry and symmetry operations.
  • Learn how to compute Riemann Tensor components for various metrics using Mathematica.
  • Investigate the implications of diagonal metrics on the calculation of curvature tensors.
  • Study the derivation and significance of non-trivial terms in the context of general relativity.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students specializing in general relativity and differential geometry, particularly those interested in tensor calculus and curvature analysis.

JD_PM
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
156
TL;DR
I want to understand why I do not get all non-zero terms and also if there's a way to refine better than I did.
I want to compute the Riemann Tensor of the following metric

$$ds^2 = dr^2+(r^2+b^2)d \theta^2 +(r^2+b^2)\sin^2 \theta d \phi^2 -dt^2$$

Before going through it I'd like to try to predict how many non-trivial components we'd expect to get, based on the Riemann tensor basic rule:

It is antisymmetric in its first and second pairs of indices but symmetric under exchange of these two pairs, i.e.:

$$R_{\mu \nu \rho \sigma}=-R_{\nu \mu \rho \sigma}=-R_{\mu \nu \sigma \rho}=R_{\rho \sigma \mu \nu} \tag 2$$

OK. My conclusions are:

1) Based on ##(2)## I understand that terms with 3 or 4 repeated indices will vanish.

2) Based on ##(2)## and the fact that we're dealing with a diagonal metric, I see that we need to have one index repeated at least twice if we want to get a non-trivial term.

So based on such analysis I get 18 potential non-trivial terms:

$$R_{r \theta r \theta}, \ \ R_{r \phi r \phi}, \ \ R_{\theta \phi \theta \phi}, \ \ R_{r t r t}, \ \ R_{\theta t \theta t}, \ \ R_{\phi t \phi t}, \ \ R_{r \theta r \phi}, \ \ R_{\theta r \theta \phi}, \ \ R_{\phi r \phi \theta}$$ $$R_{ t r t \phi}, \ \ R_{t \theta t \phi}, \ \ R_{\phi \theta \phi t}, \ \ R_{t r t \theta}, \ \ R_{\theta r \theta t}, \ \ R_{\theta \phi \theta t}, \ \ R_{r \theta r t}, \ \ R_{\phi r \phi t}, \ \ R_{r \phi r t} \tag3$$

Note that we can get more than 18 non-trivial terms out of antisymmetry and symmetry operations on these 18 terms.

OK now is time to check this; Mathematica yields (for anyone interested in the code check Artes solution here):

Captura de pantalla (1069).png


Note we get 12 non-trivial terms. And this result includes the terms obtained out of symmetry and antisymmetry operations.

Mmm interesting. I checked every single term in (3) and only these three are non-zero:

$$R_{r \theta r \theta}=\frac{-b^2}{b^2+r^2}$$

$$R_{r \phi r \phi}=\frac{-b^2 \sin^2 (\theta)}{b^2 +r^2}$$

$$R_{\theta \phi \theta \phi}=\frac{b^2 \sin^2 (\theta)}{b^2 +r^2}$$

Besides, note that there's a non-trivial term that I am not getting:

$$R_{? ? ? ?}=\frac{b^2}{(b^2 +r^2)^2}$$

Mmm what am I missing?

Any help is appreciated.

Thank you 😀
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K