Normalization constant for Hydrogen atom

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the normalization constant for the wavefunction of the Hydrogen atom in its ground state, specifically focusing on the radial wave function and the integration required for normalization.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the limits of integration for the normalization integral, with one confirming that the limits should be from 0 to infinity. Another participant reflects on their earlier mistake of using incorrect limits.
  • Questions arise regarding the implications of the wavefunction's independence from angular coordinates on electron distribution within the atom.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the behavior of terms in the integration process, specifically why certain terms approach zero.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing clarifications and exploring conceptual implications of the wavefunction. Some guidance has been offered regarding the integration limits and the nature of the wavefunction, but questions remain about specific mathematical steps and physical interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics, particularly the normalization of wavefunctions and the interpretation of spherical symmetry in the context of electron distribution.

Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
Help, I'm losing it :cry:.

Wavefunction of Hydrogen atom in the ground state is:
[tex]\Psi (r) = Ae^{-r/r_0}[/tex]
Determine A.

I set about trying to obtain the Normalization factor.
[tex]\int \Psi^2 (r) dV = 1[/tex]

[tex]\int \left(A^2 e^{-2r/r_0}\right)(4\pi r^2)dr = 1[/tex]

What limits should I take for this integral?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wassole
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have is the radial wave function so the limits of integration would be from 0 to infinity.
 
Tide said:
What you have is the radial wave function so the limits of integration would be from 0 to infinity.
Thanks, Tide. It worked! I was trying to integrate between 0 to r0 and ended up with a nutty answer :biggrin: !

So,
[tex]\int_0^{\infty} \left(A^2 e^{-2r/r_0}\right)(4\pi r^2)dr = 1[/tex]

[tex]A^2 4\pi \int_0^{\infty} r^2 e^{-2r/r_0}dr = 1[/tex]

[tex]A^2 4\pi \left[{-r_0r^2\over 2} - {r_0^{2}r\over 2} - {r_0^{3}\over 4}\right]e^{-2r/r_0} \vert_0^{\infty} = 1[/tex]

The first two terms go to zero and only the last term survives.

[tex]A^2 4\pi \left({r_0^{3}\over 4}\right) = 1[/tex]

[tex]A = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi r_0^{3}}}[/tex]

So the normalized wavefunction will be:
[tex]\Psi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi r_0^{3}}}e^{-r/r_0}[/tex]
 
I was looking at your solution and a problem came into my head which relates to the ground state wave function. I noticed that the function is actually independent of theta and phi (Spherical coordinates). But what does that actually imply in terms of where the electrons are distributed in the atom?

Thanks

Regards,
The Keck
 
The ground state of Hydrogen atom does not contain angle dependance, it is spherical symmetric.
 
the keck said:
I was looking at your solution and a problem came into my head which relates to the ground state wave function. I noticed that the function is actually independent of theta and phi (Spherical coordinates). But what does that actually imply in terms of where the electrons are distributed in the atom?

Thanks

Regards,
The Keck

You are still trying to think with the particle picture... where electrons are points distributed somewhere in the space.

The ground state function you obtain by solving the schroedinger equation is the probability amplitude of the electron... Hence, in a sense... electron is like a cloud spread out around the nucleus...
 
Hi,
I don't understand why the first two terms go to zero and why exponential goes to 1. Is r always 0?
Irene
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
4K